Fix handling sync status by harmonizing SDK and custom sync statuses

[Lentumunai-Mark]

IMPORTANT: Where possible all PRs must be linked to a Github issue

Fixes #3687

Engineer Checklist

• I have written Unit tests for any new feature(s) and edge cases for bug fixes
• I have added any strings visible on UI components to the strings.xml file
• I have updated the CHANGELOG.md file for any notable changes to the codebase
• I have run ./gradlew spotlessApply and ./gradlew spotlessCheck to check my code follows the project's style guide
• I have built and run the FHIRCore app to verify my change fixes the issue and/or does not break the app
• I have checked that this PR does NOT introduce breaking changes that require an update to Content and/or Configs? If it does add a sample here or a link to exactly what changes need to be made to the content.

Code Reviewer Checklist

• I have verified Unit tests have been written for any new feature(s) and edge cases
• I have verified any strings visible on UI components are in the strings.xml file
• I have verifed the CHANGELOG.md file has any notable changes to the codebase
• I have verified the solution has been implemented in a configurable and generic way for reuseable components
• I have built and run the FHIRCore app to verify the change fixes the issue and/or does not break the app

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 6.01504% with 250 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 37.8%. Comparing base (a790c9d) to head (2ae8519).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
.../fhircore/engine/sync/CustomResourceSyncService.kt	0.0%	77 Missing ⚠️
...rcore/quest/ui/shared/components/SyncStatusView.kt	0.0%	38 Missing ⚠️
...ter/fhircore/quest/ui/register/RegisterFragment.kt	0.0%	29 Missing ⚠️
...re/quest/ui/geowidget/GeoWidgetLauncherFragment.kt	0.0%	24 Missing ⚠️
...martregister/fhircore/engine/sync/AppSyncWorker.kt	4.5%	21 Missing ⚠️
...rtregister/fhircore/engine/sync/SyncBroadcaster.kt	0.0%	16 Missing ⚠️
...core/engine/configuration/ConfigurationRegistry.kt	8.3%	11 Missing ⚠️
...register/fhircore/quest/ui/main/AppMainActivity.kt	0.0%	11 Missing ⚠️
...ter/fhircore/quest/ui/main/components/AppDrawer.kt	0.0%	9 Missing ⚠️
...egister/fhircore/quest/ui/main/AppMainViewModel.kt	54.5%	5 Missing ⚠️
... and 5 more

❌ Your patch check has failed because the patch coverage (6.0%) is below the target coverage (60.0%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main   #3650     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage     38.6%   37.8%   -0.8%     
+ Complexity    1168    1150     -18     
=========================================
  Files          286     287      +1     
  Lines        15291   15468    +177     
  Branches      2697    2714     +17     
=========================================
- Hits          5907    5858     -49     
- Misses        8536    8772    +236     
+ Partials       848     838     -10     

Flag	Coverage Δ
engine	60.7% <2.3%> (-2.1%)	⬇️
geowidget	16.0% <ø> (ø)
quest	24.4% <9.5%> (-0.1%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...gister/fhircore/engine/util/SharedPreferenceKey.kt	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...er/fhircore/engine/util/SharedPreferencesHelper.kt	52.7% <ø> (+2.7%)	⬆️
...artregister/fhircore/quest/ui/main/AppMainEvent.kt	95.2% <100.0%> (+0.7%)	⬆️
...hircore/quest/ui/shared/models/AppDrawerUIState.kt	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...gister/fhircore/engine/sync/SyncListenerManager.kt	66.6% <0.0%> (-14.2%)	⬇️
...rg/smartregister/fhircore/engine/sync/SyncState.kt	0.0% <0.0%> (ø)
...core/quest/ui/geowidget/GeoWidgetLauncherScreen.kt	0.0% <0.0%> (ø)
...ister/fhircore/quest/ui/register/RegisterScreen.kt	0.0% <0.0%> (ø)
...egister/fhircore/quest/ui/main/AppMainViewModel.kt	68.1% <54.5%> (-0.6%)	⬇️
...ircore/quest/ui/usersetting/UserSettingFragment.kt	0.0% <0.0%> (ø)
... and 9 more

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

[pld]

looks good! can you please cover the new code paths with tests, thank you!

[ellykits]

@HenryRae Can you review this? For context, we are trying to harmonize the sync UI. For EUSM we run 2 kinds of sync. The first sync downloads the location hierarchy and the second downloads/uploads user data. Right now, it's technically easier to separate the sync processes and observe their states independently. The first sync needs to be completed before the second sync is started. We need a way to notify the user when any syncs are running. For now, we show progress and success/failure for both as seen in the screenshots.

[HenryRae]

@HenryRae Can you review this? For context, we are trying to harmonize the sync UI. For EUSM we run 2 kinds of sync. The first sync downloads the location hierarchy and the second downloads/uploads user data. Right now, it's technically easier to separate the sync processes and observe their states independently. The first sync needs to be completed before the second sync is started. We need a way to notify the user when any syncs are running. For now, we show progress and success/failure for both as seen in the screenshots.

@ellykits This is okay, we can show the second progress 3-5 seconds after the first sync success message