Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes #419: Allow configuration of haproxy option persist #420

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

thomaswoeckinger
Copy link

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from candita and frobware September 23, 2022 08:51
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Sep 23, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 23, 2022

Hi @thomaswoeckinger. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@thomaswoeckinger
Copy link
Author

/assign @candita

@candita candita removed their assignment Oct 3, 2022
@thomaswoeckinger
Copy link
Author

/assign @frobware

@frobware
Copy link
Contributor

frobware commented Oct 4, 2022

As this would be new functionality please can you file an RFE under https://issues.redhat.com/projects/RFE/issues with the "Network Edge" component. PM and engineering meet regularly to discuss all RFEs.

@frobware
Copy link
Contributor

frobware commented Oct 4, 2022

/unassign

@thomaswoeckinger
Copy link
Author

As this would be new functionality please can you file an RFE under https://issues.redhat.com/projects/RFE/issues with the "Network Edge" component. PM and engineering meet regularly to discuss all RFEs.

@frobware
After login, when clicking the create button it is not possible to create an issue for the project Openshift Request for Enhancement. There is also no Project Network Edge or similar available.

Maybe i do not have permissions for that projects?

@Miciah
Copy link
Contributor

Miciah commented Oct 5, 2022

/assign

@thomaswoeckinger
Copy link
Author

@Miciah Can you change the permissions to Openshift Request for Enhancement so that i can create an RFE?

@thomaswoeckinger
Copy link
Author

/assign @Miciah

@candita
Copy link
Contributor

candita commented Oct 5, 2022

@thomaswoeckinger Thank you for the PR. As @frobware mentioned, this looks like a new feature. We have a new RFE process, so will look into why can't use it, but in the meantime:

We need a better description in this PR, and annotation unit testing in TestConfigTemplate, see https://github.com/openshift/router/blob/master/pkg/router/router_test.go#L181

Would you be willing to make a PR to add documentation for the new annotation? Route annotations are documented here: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/blob/main/modules/nw-route-specific-annotations.adoc

@thomaswoeckinger
Copy link
Author

@thomaswoeckinger Thank you for the PR. As @frobware mentioned, this looks like a new feature. We have a new RFE process, so will look into why can't use it, but in the meantime:

We need a better description in this PR, and annotation unit testing in TestConfigTemplate, see https://github.com/openshift/router/blob/master/pkg/router/router_test.go#L181

I will add one

Would you be willing to make a PR to add documentation for the new annotation? Route annotations are documented here: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/blob/main/modules/nw-route-specific-annotations.adoc

I will add some documentation to.

@thomaswoeckinger
Copy link
Author

@Miciah , @frobware , @candita due to testing i found out that the router will remove a server entry from the backend as soon as the EndpointSlice is marked as ready state 'false' even if serving state is 'true'.
Instead a set server <backend>/<server> state drainshould be issued on the router.
Can you tell me an code entry point where it is possible to issue such a command?

@candita
Copy link
Contributor

candita commented Oct 12, 2022

@Miciah , @frobware , @candita due to testing i found out that the router will remove a server entry from the backend as soon as the EndpointSlice is marked as ready state 'false' even if serving state is 'true'. Instead a set server <backend>/<server> state drainshould be issued on the router. Can you tell me an code entry point where it is possible to issue such a command?

@thomaswoeckinger we will get in touch regarding the next steps on this one. It's possible that this will require a RFE and enhancement document.

@thomaswoeckinger
Copy link
Author

Added test case for the new option, as the used parser does not support retrieval of option attribute at the moment, i had to check it by simple old string parsing

@thomaswoeckinger
Copy link
Author

@Miciah @candita @frobware Added a pull request for the documentation openshift/openshift-docs#52923

@Miciah
Copy link
Contributor

Miciah commented Nov 28, 2022

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Nov 28, 2022
@thomaswoeckinger
Copy link
Author

@Miciah The two failing test jobs are not related to the changes as far as i see

@thomaswoeckinger
Copy link
Author

/retest-required

@thomaswoeckinger
Copy link
Author

/retest

@thomaswoeckinger
Copy link
Author

@Miciah @candita @frobware test are successful now

@thomaswoeckinger
Copy link
Author

@Miciah @candita @frobware anything new?

@thomaswoeckinger
Copy link
Author

@Miciah @candita @frobware ping

@thomaswoeckinger
Copy link
Author

thomaswoeckinger commented Feb 28, 2023

As this would be new functionality please can you file an RFE under https://issues.redhat.com/projects/RFE/issues with the "Network Edge" component. PM and engineering meet regularly to discuss all RFEs.

@frobware Can you tell me the project to use.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 28, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from miciah. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 28, 2023

@thomaswoeckinger: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial 90418bd link true /test e2e-aws-serial
ci/prow/e2e-upgrade 90418bd link true /test e2e-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 27, 2023
@thomaswoeckinger
Copy link
Author

As this would be new functionality please can you file an RFE under https://issues.redhat.com/projects/RFE/issues with the "Network Edge" component. PM and engineering meet regularly to discuss all RFEs.

I still can not create an issue because when i click 'create' there is no project RFE or 'Openshift Request for Enhancement' available i use [email protected] as login

@thomaswoeckinger
Copy link
Author

/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 30, 2023
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 29, 2023
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Oct 29, 2023
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Nov 29, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 29, 2023

@openshift-bot: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants