Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

.gitignore: Empty out #336

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 1, 2018

Conversation

cgwalters
Copy link
Member

I found it very confusing when I added a scripts/build-prepare
and it wasn't showing up in git status. Turned out to be the
build* rule in .gitignore.

A quick glance at git log shows those rules were intended to
ignore rpmdistro-gitoverlay artifacts. But we don't really
encourage doing that in this directory at all, and the metadata
now lives in rdgo anyways.

Also hopefully soon the assembler will learn how to rdgo or
equivalent.

I found it very confusing when I added a `scripts/build-prepare`
and it wasn't showing up in `git status`.  Turned out to be the
`build*` rule in `.gitignore`.

A quick glance at `git log` shows those rules were intended to
ignore rpmdistro-gitoverlay artifacts.  But we don't really
encourage doing that in this directory at all, and the metadata
now lives in `rdgo` anyways.

Also hopefully soon the assembler will learn how to rdgo or
equivalent.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 1, 2018
@miabbott
Copy link
Member

miabbott commented Oct 1, 2018

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 1, 2018
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 1e77a7a into openshift:master Oct 1, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants