Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DO_NOT_MERGE] Logging upgrade #208

Closed
wants to merge 16 commits into from

Conversation

ewolinetz
Copy link
Contributor

@sosiouxme @jcantrill @richm PTAL - this isn't to be merged in, but will be used for QE to test from.
I plan to update the Readme as well to cover topics such as de-dotting and to update the health-check information. Also it having a PR will allow it to go through the CI testing process.

Other things to note:
SG currently doesn't let us configure its index. [1]
And if I remember correctly we are impacted by this when trying to connect to another ES node for clustering (will retest) [2]

[1] https://github.com/floragunncom/search-guard/issues/176
[2] https://github.com/floragunncom/search-guard/issues/153

@ewolinetz
Copy link
Contributor Author

There seems to be some strangeness with SG initializing itself when there are multiple nodes in the cluster. I'm going to investigate seeding SG sooner in the openshift-elasticsearch-plugin...

@ewolinetz ewolinetz force-pushed the logging_upgrade branch 22 times, most recently from dd5e6b7 to 8d89b37 Compare August 15, 2016 16:53
@richm
Copy link
Contributor

richm commented Aug 30, 2016

find the troublesome record:

     time ${(record["_SOURCE_REALTIME_TIMESTAMP"] || record["__REALTIME_TIMESTAMP"]) ? Time.at((record["_SOURCE_REALTIME_TIMESTAMP"] || record["__REALTIME_TIMESTAMP"]).to_f / 1000000.0).to_datetime.rfc3339(6) : puts "bad record #{record}"} 

@ewolinetz ewolinetz force-pushed the logging_upgrade branch 5 times, most recently from fd49e77 to 558673a Compare August 30, 2016 22:04
@openshift-bot openshift-bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 31, 2016
@ewolinetz
Copy link
Contributor Author

after #215 and #217 merge in, i'll rebase and have this start being tested

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Evaluated for aggregated logging test up to e110284

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Aggregated Logging Test Results: FAILURE (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test-origin-aggregated-logging/758/)

@ewolinetz
Copy link
Contributor Author

closing in favor of #219

@ewolinetz ewolinetz closed this Sep 6, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants