OCPBUGS-27095: Suggest workload partitioning annotation in the namespace

[suleymanakbas91]

No description provided.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@suleymanakbas91: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27095, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[jakobmoellerdev]

/lgtm

[jakobmoellerdev]

/override ci/prow/snyk-deps

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jakobmoellerdev, suleymanakbas91

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [jakobmoellerdev,suleymanakbas91]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci]

@jakobmoellerdev: Overrode contexts on behalf of jakobmoellerdev: ci/prow/snyk-deps

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/snyk-deps

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[suleymanakbas91]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@suleymanakbas91: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27095, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0)
• bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @radeore

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

@suleymanakbas91: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@suleymanakbas91: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27095: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• openshift/lvm-operator#537

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27095 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[suleymanakbas91]

/cherry-pick release-4.15

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@suleymanakbas91: new pull request created: #538

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[suleymanakbas91]

/cherry-pick release-4.14

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@suleymanakbas91: new pull request created: #541

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[suleymanakbas91]

/cherry-pick release-4.13

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@suleymanakbas91: #537 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.13":

Applying: fix: suggest workload partitioning annotation in the namespace
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	bundle/manifests/lvms-operator.clusterserviceversion.yaml
M	config/manifests/bases/clusterserviceversion.yaml.in
M	config/manifests/bases/lvms-operator.clusterserviceversion.yaml
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging config/manifests/bases/lvms-operator.clusterserviceversion.yaml
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in config/manifests/bases/lvms-operator.clusterserviceversion.yaml
Auto-merging config/manifests/bases/clusterserviceversion.yaml.in
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in config/manifests/bases/clusterserviceversion.yaml.in
Auto-merging bundle/manifests/lvms-operator.clusterserviceversion.yaml
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in bundle/manifests/lvms-operator.clusterserviceversion.yaml
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 fix: suggest workload partitioning annotation in the namespace
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.13

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.