Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat!: Micro LVMS - Edge / Low Resource Optimized LVMS #501

Closed
wants to merge 68 commits into from

Conversation

jakobmoellerdev
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

jakobmoellerdev and others added 30 commits November 13, 2023 14:43
…-node-vgmanager

feat!: merge vgmanager and topolvm-node
…-node-vgmanager

chore: optimize vgmanager heap memory
…-node-vgmanager

chore: more heap optimizations to get vgmanager < 30 mi of RAM
…-node-vgmanager

chore: more heap optimizations to get vgmanager < 30 mi of RAM
feat: merge topolvm-controller into lvm-operator
chore: cpu sys time optimizations on os file lookup
Signed-off-by: Jakob Möller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakob Möller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakob Möller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakob Möller <[email protected]>
…-node-vgmanager

feat: merge csi external provisioner and liveness probe
Signed-off-by: Suleyman Akbas <[email protected]>
…ection

chore: fix broken csi provisioner lib and thus leader election shutdown
feat: merge csi-resizer into lvm-operator
@jakobmoellerdev
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test all

Signed-off-by: Jakob Möller <[email protected]>
@jakobmoellerdev
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test all

@jakobmoellerdev
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test lvm-operator-e2e-aws

suleymanakbas91 and others added 2 commits November 21, 2023 12:51
fix: trigger update after cm changes
@jakobmoellerdev
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test all

@suleymanakbas91
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

suleymanakbas91 and others added 2 commits November 22, 2023 11:10
@jakobmoellerdev
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test all

@suleymanakbas91
Copy link
Contributor

/test all

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 23, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 14, 2023
@jakobmoellerdev
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test all

@jakobmoellerdev
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test all

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 14, 2023

@jakobmoellerdev: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/snyk-code c72c249 link false /test snyk-code

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@jakobmoellerdev
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing in favor of #533

@suleymanakbas91 suleymanakbas91 deleted the micro-lvms branch July 3, 2024 14:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants