Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: fix labels for topolvm-node-metrics service #157

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 19, 2022

Conversation

sp98
Copy link
Contributor

@sp98 sp98 commented Apr 19, 2022

Updates the service config to use the new label key app.lvm.openshift.io.

Signed-off-by: Santosh Pillai [email protected]

@sp98 sp98 requested review from leelavg and nbalacha April 19, 2022 07:15
Copy link
Contributor

@leelavg leelavg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 19, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 19, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: leelavg, nbalacha, sp98

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 19, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit bc59df7 into openshift:main Apr 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants