Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

terraform: azurerm bump provider to v3.19.1 #6262

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 3, 2022

Conversation

r4f4
Copy link
Contributor

@r4f4 r4f4 commented Aug 24, 2022

This is the first step needed for enabling arm64 support.

/cc @Prashanth684

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from Prashanth684 August 24, 2022 15:57
@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor Author

r4f4 commented Aug 24, 2022

/cc @patrickdillon

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from patrickdillon August 24, 2022 16:12
@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor

This LGTM, but how does this enable ARM instances/shared gallery images? The VM resource is already using the image_source_id attribute, which is--I believe--how we would pass a gallery image.

Do we need to read the gallery image as a data source source or something?

@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor

This LGTM, but how does this enable ARM instances/shared gallery images? The VM resource is already using the image_source_id attribute, which is--I believe--how we would pass a gallery image.

Do we need to read the gallery image as a data source source or something?

I found the answer in a jira comment, which points to this: hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#17768

@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor Author

r4f4 commented Aug 24, 2022

The gallery image work will come in future PRs. @Prashanth684 is working on them.

@Prashanth684
Copy link
Contributor

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ARMOCP-429 has details about the changes needed for bootimage creation for arm64. The next step will be to add creation of arm64 bootimages using the image gallery.

@Prashanth684
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@Prashanth684
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 25, 2022
@Prashanth684
Copy link
Contributor

@patrickdillon are we good for an approval?

@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor

sadasu commented Aug 30, 2022

/test e2e-azurestack

@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor

sadasu commented Aug 30, 2022

/test e2e-azure-resourcegroup

@Prashanth684
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-azurestack

@Prashanth684
Copy link
Contributor

@sadasu took a brief look at the e2e-azurestack error logs. the nodes are all up and all the operators are up except the csi driver and monitoring . the csi driver pods are failing with CreateContainerConfigError and this message:

secret \"azure-disk-credentials\" not found

i don't think it is related to this change.

@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor

sadasu commented Aug 31, 2022

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 31, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sadasu

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 31, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 5c8ec74 and 2 for PR HEAD 2e519f0 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 679e56e and 1 for PR HEAD 2e519f0 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD ba0e40c and 0 for PR HEAD 2e519f0 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

Revision 2e519f0 was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 1, 2022
@Prashanth684
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

@Prashanth684
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-azure

@Prashanth684
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

@Prashanth684
Copy link
Contributor

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 2, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD f2e5195 and 2 for PR HEAD 2e519f0 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 82dcbcc and 1 for PR HEAD 2e519f0 in total

@Prashanth684
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 3, 2022

@r4f4: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi 2e519f0 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi
ci/prow/e2e-libvirt 2e519f0 link false /test e2e-libvirt
ci/prow/e2e-openstack 2e519f0 link false /test e2e-openstack
ci/prow/e2e-ibmcloud 2e519f0 link false /test e2e-ibmcloud
ci/prow/e2e-azurestack 2e519f0 link false /test e2e-azurestack

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD f6c8f52 and 0 for PR HEAD 2e519f0 in total

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 3f0676c into openshift:master Sep 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants