Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-4.18] OCPBUGS-45616: performanceprofile cpuset input validation #1239

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1231

/assign rbaturov

This fix ensures that the input for any CPU set field is valid. If an invalid string that does not represent a valid CPU set is provided, the admission webhook will return an appropriate error, such as:
spec.cpu: Internal error: strconv.Atoi: parsing "garbage": invalid syntax

This replaces the previous behavior where the server would return an error like:
Error from server: error when creating "pp.yaml": admission webhook "vwb.performance.openshift.io" denied the request: panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference [recovered].

Signed-off-by: Ronny Baturov <[email protected]>
Fuzz test for ValidateCPUs to verify it handles both valid and invalid inputs without panicking. This ensures that all potential errors are exercised and no panic occurs during execution.

Signed-off-by: Ronny Baturov <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-45346 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-45616. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle [release-4.18] OCPBUGS-45616: performanceprofile cpuset input validation

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1231

/assign rbaturov

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.18] OCPBUGS-45346: performanceprofile cpuset input validation [release-4.18] OCPBUGS-45616: performanceprofile cpuset input validation Dec 5, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 5, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-45616, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1231

/assign rbaturov

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from dagrayvid and yanirq December 5, 2024 09:29
@rbaturov
Copy link
Contributor

rbaturov commented Dec 5, 2024

/retest-required

@rbaturov
Copy link
Contributor

rbaturov commented Dec 8, 2024

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 8, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rbaturov: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-45616, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.18.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.18.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-45346 is in the state ON_QA, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-45346 targets the "4.19.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.19.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @mrniranjan

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from mrniranjan December 8, 2024 09:01
@yanirq
Copy link
Contributor

yanirq commented Dec 8, 2024

/approve

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 8, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot, yanirq

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 8, 2024
@yanirq
Copy link
Contributor

yanirq commented Dec 8, 2024

/lgtm
/label backport-risk-assessed

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 8, 2024

@yanirq: The label(s) /label backport-risk-assessed, cannot be applied. These labels are supported: acknowledge-critical-fixes-only, platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, no-qe, downstream-change-needed, rebase/manual, cluster-config-api-changed, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, jira/valid-bug, staff-eng-approved. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

In response to this:

/lgtm
/label backport-risk-assessed,

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 8, 2024
@mrniranjan
Copy link
Contributor

/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Dec 9, 2024
@yanirq
Copy link
Contributor

yanirq commented Dec 9, 2024

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Dec 9, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 0593ea3 and 2 for PR HEAD 45bafd9 in total

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 9, 2024

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 49ab6f7 into openshift:release-4.18 Dec 9, 2024
17 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-45616: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-45616 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1231

/assign rbaturov

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: cluster-node-tuning-operator
This PR has been included in build cluster-node-tuning-operator-container-v4.18.0-202412092208.p0.g49ab6f7.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@rbaturov
Copy link
Contributor

/cherry-pick release-4.17 release-4.16

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Author

@rbaturov: new pull request created: #1247

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.17 release-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants