-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OSASINFRA-3133 - OpenStack support #195
Conversation
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
2add629
to
3c9d625
Compare
pkg/machineproviders/providers/openshift/machine/v1beta1/failuredomain/failuredomain.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
41d0792
to
ca2234e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Generally, the code LGTM. I would appreciate that someone else would look at this after KubeCon.
cc/ @JoelSpeed @damdo
pkg/machineproviders/providers/openshift/machine/v1beta1/failuredomain/failuredomain.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
pkg/controllers/controlplanemachinesetgenerator/controller_test.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
pkg/controllers/controlplanemachinesetgenerator/controller_test.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
pkg/machineproviders/providers/openshift/machine/v1beta1/failuredomain/failuredomain.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
db07333
to
de7743f
Compare
@pierreprinetti much better with the new installer patchset:
@damdo @JoelSpeed ready for review when you have time. Nothing changed much since your last reviews, except the last 2 commits I would say, which are small enough to be quickly reviewed. |
de7743f
to
318b324
Compare
Co-Authored-By: Emilien Macchi <[email protected]> Co-Authored-By: Pierre Prinetti <[email protected]>
f4c6915
to
d43ed9a
Compare
If `OPENSTACK_CONTROLPLANE_FLAVOR_ALTERNATE` is found in the environment variables, we'll use that flavor when running the control plane verticale scale tests. Otherwise, roll back on the tags.
```yaml | ||
- availabilityZone: "<nova availability zone>" | ||
rootVolume: | ||
availabilityZone: "<cinder availability zone>" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Didn't we add another field to the AZ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if you're talking about the volume type, it'll be handled separately via #217
|
||
#### Configuring a control plane machine set on OpenStack | ||
|
||
Two fields are supported for now: `availabilityZone` (instance AZ) and `rootVolume.availabilityZone` (root volume AZ). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this need updating for the third field that we added?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
volume type will be handled separately via #217
Apart from the nit about the errors, I think this is good to go, thanks for working with us on this 😄 |
/approve |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This code seems to be behaving conform to the spec. I believe that there is no reason to further defer testing in vivo.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed, pierreprinetti The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm |
/retest-required |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Thanks for all you efforts!
@EmilienM: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/retest-required |
OpenStack support in CPMS.