-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 137
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPCLOUD-2010: Re-vendor api to support external platform #306
OCPCLOUD-2010: Re-vendor api to support external platform #306
Conversation
@adriengentil Before/if this ever gets merged somewhere, please remove the github handles from the commit message. Having github handles in commit messages is a nightmare for anyone who is tagged, any time someone forks the repo or pushes this commit in some way, GitHub will notify you |
726a79d
to
da1713e
Compare
/test e2e-aws-ovn |
da1713e
to
814bc4c
Compare
@adriengentil: This pull request references OCPCLOUD-2010 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/test e2e-aws-ovn |
@adriengentil: This pull request references OCPCLOUD-2010 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
814bc4c
to
19d072b
Compare
68f3161
to
115ef07
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this lgtm, obviously needs an update once the api change lands
Re-vendor openshift/api in order to support the external platform. API PR: openshift/api#1434
115ef07
to
e4ea2e1
Compare
/retitle OCPCLOUD-2010: Re-vendor api to support external platform |
/lgtm |
This enables both DualStackNodeIPs and ExternalCloudProviderExternal, both of which have tested independently to prove that they are not affecting the existing payload |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: adriengentil, elmiko, JoelSpeed The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: adriengentil, elmiko, JoelSpeed The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@adriengentil: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/label jira/valid-bug |
Re-vendor openshift/api in order to support the external platform.
API PR: openshift/api#1434