Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1996155: UPSTREAM: 964: getOrCreatePort: add support to configure port Profile #195

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 20, 2021

Conversation

EmilienM
Copy link
Member

@EmilienM EmilienM commented Aug 10, 2021

Upstream: kubernetes-sigs#964

Configuring port profiles can be useful to enable an application
running on the specified host to pass and receive VIF port-specific
information to the plugin.

One of the use-cases here is when configuring ports in OVS Hardware
offload, where we need to use the profile:
{"capabilities": ["switchdev"]}

Thanks to this patch, we'll now able to do it when creating the
machines and their ports.

OSASINFRA-2434

@EmilienM EmilienM changed the title getOrCreatePort: add support to configure port Profile UPSTREAM: 964: getOrCreatePort: add support to configure port Profile Aug 10, 2021
@EmilienM
Copy link
Member Author

/hold
waiting for upstream to merge first.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 11, 2021
Configuring port profiles can be useful to enable an application
running on the specified host to pass and receive VIF port-specific
information to the plugin.

One of the use-cases here is when configuring ports in OVS Hardware
offload, where we need to use the profile:
{"capabilities": ["switchdev"]}

Thanks to this patch, we'll now able to do it when creating the
machines and their ports.
thinx cluster-api-provider-

OSASINFRA-2434
@EmilienM
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 12, 2021
@EmilienM
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @iamemilio

@iamemilio
Copy link

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 17, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 17, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: iamemilio

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 17, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

13 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@EmilienM
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

8 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@EmilienM EmilienM changed the title UPSTREAM: 964: getOrCreatePort: add support to configure port Profile Bug1996155: UPSTREAM: 964: getOrCreatePort: add support to configure port Profile Aug 20, 2021
@EmilienM
Copy link
Member Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

@EmilienM: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@EmilienM EmilienM changed the title Bug1996155: UPSTREAM: 964: getOrCreatePort: add support to configure port Profile Bug 1996155: UPSTREAM: 964: getOrCreatePort: add support to configure port Profile Aug 20, 2021
@EmilienM
Copy link
Member Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 20, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

@EmilienM: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1996155, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @eurijon

In response to this:

Bug 1996155: UPSTREAM: 964: getOrCreatePort: add support to configure port Profile

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

@EmilienM: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1996155, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @eurijon

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

@openshift-ci[bot]: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: eurijon.

Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@EmilienM: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1996155, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @eurijon

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

@openshift-ci[bot]: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: eurijon.

Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@EmilienM: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1996155, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @eurijon

In response to this:

Bug 1996155: UPSTREAM: 964: getOrCreatePort: add support to configure port Profile

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@EmilienM
Copy link
Member Author

/test unit

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

@EmilienM: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-byon 86d4300 link /test e2e-openstack-byon

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a7442bb into openshift:master Aug 20, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

@EmilienM: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1996155 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1996155: UPSTREAM: 964: getOrCreatePort: add support to configure port Profile

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@EmilienM EmilienM deleted the profile_support branch August 21, 2021 00:59
pierreprinetti pushed a commit to shiftstack/cluster-api-provider-openstack that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2024
There's no point for us to stick with alpha versions. Let's use the
master branch until there's a release candidate that we can pin to and
stick with.

Master doesn't necessarily mean using bleeding edge as we can still
control the updates and evaluate them case by case.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants