Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUILD-174: Always Build with -mod vendor #415

Merged

Conversation

adambkaplan
Copy link
Contributor

We no longer need to test if we are building with go modules and the -mod vendor mode; always build with -mod vendor because vendoring dependencies is an OpenShift standard practice.

We no longer need to test if we are building with go modules and the
`-mod vendor` mode; always build with `-mod vendor` because vendoring
dependencies is an OpenShift standard practice.

Signed-off-by: Adam Kaplan <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Dec 6, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 6, 2024

@adambkaplan: This pull request references OCPBUILD-174 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

We no longer need to test if we are building with go modules and the -mod vendor mode; always build with -mod vendor because vendoring dependencies is an OpenShift standard practice.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 6, 2024
@adambkaplan
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Unit tests should pass now that #412 merged.

@adambkaplan
Copy link
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-builds

Known issue with builds e2e test

@adambkaplan
Copy link
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-builds-techpreview

Known issue with builds e2e

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 12, 2024

@adambkaplan: Overrode contexts on behalf of adambkaplan: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-builds

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-builds

Known issue with builds e2e test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 12, 2024

@adambkaplan: Overrode contexts on behalf of adambkaplan: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-builds-techpreview

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-builds-techpreview

Known issue with builds e2e

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@prabhapa
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 16, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 16, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: adambkaplan, prabhapa

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 0ee78ff and 2 for PR HEAD b138e6d in total

8 similar comments
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 0ee78ff and 2 for PR HEAD b138e6d in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 0ee78ff and 2 for PR HEAD b138e6d in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 0ee78ff and 2 for PR HEAD b138e6d in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 0ee78ff and 2 for PR HEAD b138e6d in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 0ee78ff and 2 for PR HEAD b138e6d in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 0ee78ff and 2 for PR HEAD b138e6d in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 0ee78ff and 2 for PR HEAD b138e6d in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 0ee78ff and 2 for PR HEAD b138e6d in total

@adambkaplan
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@adambkaplan
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label docs-approved

No doc impact

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the docs-approved Signifies that Docs has signed off on this PR label Jan 6, 2025
@adambkaplan
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label px-approved

No product experience impact

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the px-approved Signifies that Product Support has signed off on this PR label Jan 6, 2025
@adambkaplan
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label qe-approved

Verified through existing CI test suites.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Jan 6, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 6, 2025

@adambkaplan: This pull request references OCPBUILD-174 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

We no longer need to test if we are building with go modules and the -mod vendor mode; always build with -mod vendor because vendoring dependencies is an OpenShift standard practice.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 6, 2025

@adambkaplan: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/security b138e6d link false /test security

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 6fba4cb into openshift:master Jan 6, 2025
11 of 12 checks passed
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: openshift-enterprise-builder
This PR has been included in build openshift-enterprise-builder-container-v4.19.0-202501072235.p0.g6fba4cb.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. docs-approved Signifies that Docs has signed off on this PR jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. px-approved Signifies that Product Support has signed off on this PR qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants