NO-ISSUE: Add amd gpu operator

[jhernand]

This patch adds the AMD GPU operator as a dependency of the OpenShift AI operator.

List all the issues related to this PR

• New Feature
• Enhancement
• Bug fix
• Tests
• Documentation
• CI/CD

What environments does this code impact?

• Automation (CI, tools, etc)
• Cloud
• Operator Managed Deployments
• None

How was this code tested?

• assisted-test-infra environment
• dev-scripts environment
• Reviewer's test appreciated
• Waiting for CI to do a full test run
• Manual (Elaborate on how it was tested)
• No tests needed

Checklist

• Title and description added to both, commit and PR.
• Relevant issues have been associated (see CONTRIBUTING guide)
• This change does not require a documentation update (docstring, docs, README, etc)
• Does this change include unit-tests (note that code changes require unit-tests)

Reviewers Checklist

• Are the title and description (in both PR and commit) meaningful and clear?
• Is there a bug required (and linked) for this change?
• Should this PR be backported?

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jhernand

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [jhernand]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jhernand: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

In response to this:

This patch adds the AMD GPU operator as a dependency of the OpenShift AI operator.

List all the issues related to this PR

• New Feature
• Enhancement
• Bug fix
• Tests
• Documentation
• CI/CD

What environments does this code impact?

• Automation (CI, tools, etc)
• Cloud
• Operator Managed Deployments
• None

How was this code tested?

• assisted-test-infra environment
• dev-scripts environment
• Reviewer's test appreciated
• Waiting for CI to do a full test run
• Manual (Elaborate on how it was tested)
• No tests needed

Checklist

• Title and description added to both, commit and PR.
• Relevant issues have been associated (see CONTRIBUTING guide)
• This change does not require a documentation update (docstring, docs, README, etc)
• Does this change include unit-tests (note that code changes require unit-tests)

Reviewers Checklist

• Are the title and description (in both PR and commit) meaningful and clear?
• Is there a bug required (and linked) for this change?
• Should this PR be backported?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[jhernand]

/hold

Needs to be rebased after #7218 is merged.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 43.41317% with 189 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 67.73%. Comparing base (9df3014) to head (9bd831b).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
internal/operators/kmm/kmm_operator.go	9.52%	74 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
internal/operators/amdgpu/amd_gpu_operator.go	32.25%	59 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
internal/operators/kmm/kmm_manifests.go	55.81%	13 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
internal/operators/amdgpu/amd_gpu_manifests.go	69.76%	7 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
internal/featuresupport/features_olm_operators.go	69.23%	8 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
internal/operators/amdgpu/amd_gpu_templates.go	60.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
internal/operators/kmm/kmm_templates.go	60.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...nal/operators/openshiftai/openshift_ai_operator.go	81.81%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7222      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   67.89%   67.73%   -0.17%     
==========================================
  Files         298      304       +6     
  Lines       40666    41036     +370     
==========================================
+ Hits        27609    27794     +185     
- Misses      10587    10739     +152     
- Partials     2470     2503      +33     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
internal/cluster/statemachine.go	99.65% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
internal/cluster/validation_id.go	92.30% <100.00%> (ø)
internal/featuresupport/feature_support_level.go	96.49% <ø> (ø)
internal/host/statemachine.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
internal/host/validation_id.go	90.90% <100.00%> (ø)
internal/operators/builder.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...nternal/operators/nvidiagpu/nvidia_gpu_operator.go	32.58% <100.00%> (-0.75%)	⬇️
internal/operators/amdgpu/amd_gpu_templates.go	60.00% <60.00%> (ø)
internal/operators/kmm/kmm_templates.go	60.00% <60.00%> (ø)
...nal/operators/openshiftai/openshift_ai_operator.go	57.06% <81.81%> (+7.61%)	⬆️
... and 5 more

... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes

[openshift-ci]

@jhernand: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/edge-subsystem-kubeapi-aws	9bd831b	link	true	/test edge-subsystem-kubeapi-aws
ci/prow/edge-e2e-metal-assisted-mtv-4-17	9bd831b	link	true	/test edge-e2e-metal-assisted-mtv-4-17
ci/prow/edge-e2e-ai-operator-disconnected-capi	9bd831b	link	false	/test edge-e2e-ai-operator-disconnected-capi
ci/prow/edge-subsystem-aws	9bd831b	link	true	/test edge-subsystem-aws
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn	9bd831b	link	false	/test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.