Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 2.7] Adding field level security test cases for FlatFields (#2876) #2894

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

opensearch-trigger-bot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport c2d6a3e from #2893

…2876) (#2893)

* Adding field level security test cases for FlatFields (#2876)

Signed-off-by: Craig Perkins <[email protected]>

* Add newline

Signed-off-by: Craig Perkins <[email protected]>

* Run spotlessApply

Signed-off-by: Craig Perkins <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Craig Perkins <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit c2d6a3e)
@cwperks cwperks changed the title [Backport 2.7] [Backport 2.x] Adding field level security test cases for FlatFields (#2876) [Backport 2.7] Adding field level security test cases for FlatFields (#2876) Jun 22, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 22, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #2894 (02115a2) into 2.7 (f92c967) will increase coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.7    #2894      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     61.17%   61.23%   +0.05%     
- Complexity     3304     3310       +6     
============================================
  Files           263      263              
  Lines         18425    18425              
  Branches       3256     3256              
============================================
+ Hits          11272    11283      +11     
+ Misses         5582     5573       -9     
+ Partials       1571     1569       -2     

see 5 files with indirect coverage changes

@stephen-crawford
Copy link
Contributor

Why are we backporting to 2.7?

@DarshitChanpura
Copy link
Member

Closing this as this change is not needed in 2.7 branch.

@peternied peternied deleted the backport/backport-2893-to-2.7 branch July 10, 2023 20:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants