Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Delete detector successfully if workflow is missing (#790) #809

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2024

Conversation

engechas
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Delete detector successfully if workflow is missing

Signed-off-by: Chase Engelbrecht [email protected]

  • Refactor to use existing NotFound exception checker

Signed-off-by: Chase Engelbrecht [email protected]


Signed-off-by: Chase Engelbrecht [email protected]
(cherry picked from commit 0ad91cc)

Description

Manual conflict resolution + backport

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing.
    • All tests pass
  • [N/A] New functionality has been documented.
    • [N/A] New functionality has javadoc added
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

@jowg-amazon
Copy link
Collaborator

Can you rebase from 2.x? Checks are failing because of the gradle update.

…ct#790)

* Delete detector successfully if workflow is missing

Signed-off-by: Chase Engelbrecht <[email protected]>

* Refactor to use existing NotFound exception checker

Signed-off-by: Chase Engelbrecht <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Chase Engelbrecht <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 0ad91cc)
@engechas engechas force-pushed the backport-790-to-2.x branch from 2932d25 to ac2255b Compare January 17, 2024 21:59
@engechas
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Can you rebase from 2.x? Checks are failing because of the gradle update.

Done

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 17, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 13 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (8990aed) 24.83% compared to head (ac2255b) 24.82%.

Files Patch % Lines
...ytics/transport/TransportDeleteDetectorAction.java 0.00% 13 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.x     #809      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     24.83%   24.82%   -0.02%     
  Complexity     1024     1024              
============================================
  Files           277      277              
  Lines         12683    12689       +6     
  Branches       1389     1389              
============================================
  Hits           3150     3150              
- Misses         9267     9273       +6     
  Partials        266      266              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@engechas
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Can you rebase from 2.x? Checks are failing because of the gradle update.

Done

Nvm, still failing. It doesn't look related to this PR but will investigate soon

@engechas
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This is the failure:

org.opensearch.securityanalytics.findings.FindingIT > testGetFindings_rolloverByMaxAge_success FAILED
    java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
        at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([C511499764CAA34E:81FC4FA1CAEA296F]:0)
        at java.base/jdk.internal.util.Preconditions.outOfBounds(Preconditions.java:64)
        at java.base/jdk.internal.util.Preconditions.outOfBoundsCheckIndex(Preconditions.java:70)
        at java.base/jdk.internal.util.Preconditions.checkIndex(Preconditions.java:248)
        at java.base/java.util.Objects.checkIndex(Objects.java:374)
        at java.base/java.util.ArrayList.get(ArrayList.java:459)
        at org.opensearch.securityanalytics.findings.FindingIT.testGetFindings_rolloverByMaxAge_success(FindingIT.java:325)

I confirmed it still occurs with my backported commit removed.

@jowg-amazon
Copy link
Collaborator

Yeah this is a known flakey test in SA. I'm taking a look into it now.

@jowg-amazon jowg-amazon merged commit 30edec0 into opensearch-project:2.x Feb 5, 2024
8 of 18 checks passed
riysaxen-amzn pushed a commit to riysaxen-amzn/security-analytics that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
…#810)

Signed-off-by: Ashish Agrawal <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit db83a812606655cab076c6c9001adab30d380327)

Co-authored-by: Ashish Agrawal <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants