Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 2.x] GetIndexMappings index pattern support #275

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2023

Conversation

opensearch-trigger-bot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport 0dbbbfc from #265

Signed-off-by: Petar Dzepina <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 0dbbbfc)
@opensearch-trigger-bot opensearch-trigger-bot bot requested a review from a team January 11, 2023 03:05
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 11, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #275 (a9edd49) into 2.x (3e8b089) will increase coverage by 0.26%.
The diff coverage is 69.38%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.x     #275      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     36.88%   37.15%   +0.26%     
- Complexity      882      887       +5     
============================================
  Files           179      179              
  Lines          6948     6973      +25     
  Branches        845      849       +4     
============================================
+ Hits           2563     2591      +28     
+ Misses         4149     4145       -4     
- Partials        236      237       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...search/securityanalytics/mapper/MapperService.java 4.54% <0.00%> (+0.08%) ⬆️
...ics/transport/TransportGetIndexMappingsAction.java 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...ch/securityanalytics/mapper/MappingsTraverser.java 82.35% <89.47%> (-0.70%) ⬇️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@sbcd90 sbcd90 merged commit 116d08e into 2.x Jan 11, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the backport/backport-265-to-2.x branch January 11, 2023 03:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants