Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

separate doc-level monitor query indices created by detectors #1324

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 26, 2024
Merged

separate doc-level monitor query indices created by detectors #1324

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
8e6ac76
separate doc-level monitor query indices created by detectors
sbcd90 Sep 25, 2024
b3284e7
separate doc-level monitor query indices created by detectors
sbcd90 Sep 25, 2024
1f3eb29
finalize changes
sbcd90 Sep 25, 2024
c514a78
address review comments
sbcd90 Sep 26, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion src/main/java/org/opensearch/securityanalytics/SecurityAnalyticsPlugin.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -508,7 +508,8 @@ public List<Setting<?>> getSettings() {
SecurityAnalyticsSettings.THREAT_INTEL_TIMEOUT,
SecurityAnalyticsSettings.IOC_INDEX_RETENTION_PERIOD,
SecurityAnalyticsSettings.IOC_MAX_INDICES_PER_INDEX_PATTERN,
SecurityAnalyticsSettings.IOC_SCAN_MAX_TERMS_COUNT
SecurityAnalyticsSettings.IOC_SCAN_MAX_TERMS_COUNT,
SecurityAnalyticsSettings.ENABLE_DETECTORS_WITH_DEDICATED_QUERY_INDICES
);
}

Expand Down
8 changes: 7 additions & 1 deletion src/main/java/org/opensearch/securityanalytics/config/monitors/DetectorMonitorConfig.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
package org.opensearch.securityanalytics.config.monitors;

import java.util.List;
import java.util.Random;
import java.util.UUID;
import java.util.stream.Collectors;
import org.opensearch.common.inject.Inject;
import org.opensearch.securityanalytics.logtype.LogTypeService;
Expand All @@ -22,7 +24,11 @@ public class DetectorMonitorConfig {
public static final String OPENSEARCH_SAP_RULE_INDEX_TEMPLATE = ".opensearch-sap-detectors-queries-index-template";

public static String getRuleIndex(String logType) {
return String.format(Locale.getDefault(), ".opensearch-sap-%s-detectors-queries", logType);
return String.format(Locale.getDefault(), ".opensearch-sap-%s-detectors-queries*", logType);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why *
this is an alias

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed it.

}

public static String getRuleIndexOptimized(String logType) {
return String.format(Locale.getDefault(), ".opensearch-sap-%s-detectors-queries-optimized-%s", logType, UUID.randomUUID());
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we are moving from index patttern to index?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no. this method is utilized by few integ tests & hence the change.

}

public static String getAlertsIndex(String logType) {
Expand Down
6 changes: 6 additions & 0 deletions src/main/java/org/opensearch/securityanalytics/settings/SecurityAnalyticsSettings.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -249,4 +249,10 @@ public static final List<Setting<?>> settings() {
Setting.Property.NodeScope, Setting.Property.Dynamic
);

public static final Setting<Boolean> ENABLE_DETECTORS_WITH_DEDICATED_QUERY_INDICES = Setting.boolSetting(
"plugins.security_analytics.enable_detectors_with_dedicated_query_indices",
false,
Setting.Property.NodeScope, Setting.Property.Dynamic
);

}
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions ...curityanalytics/threatIntel/transport/monitor/TransportIndexThreatIntelMonitorAction.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -239,6 +239,7 @@ private Monitor buildThreatIntelMonitor(IndexThreatIntelMonitorRequest request)
triggers,
Collections.emptyMap(),
new DataSources(),
false,
PLUGIN_OWNER_FIELD
);
} catch (Exception e) {
Expand Down
35 changes: 29 additions & 6 deletions src/main/java/org/opensearch/securityanalytics/transport/TransportIndexDetectorAction.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -156,6 +156,8 @@ public class TransportIndexDetectorAction extends HandledTransportAction<IndexDe

private volatile Boolean enabledWorkflowUsage;

private volatile Boolean enableDetectorWithDedicatedQueryIndices;

private final Settings settings;

private final NamedWriteableRegistry namedWriteableRegistry;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -202,11 +204,13 @@ public TransportIndexDetectorAction(TransportService transportService,
this.indexTimeout = SecurityAnalyticsSettings.INDEX_TIMEOUT.get(this.settings);
this.filterByEnabled = SecurityAnalyticsSettings.FILTER_BY_BACKEND_ROLES.get(this.settings);
this.enabledWorkflowUsage = SecurityAnalyticsSettings.ENABLE_WORKFLOW_USAGE.get(this.settings);
this.enableDetectorWithDedicatedQueryIndices = SecurityAnalyticsSettings.ENABLE_DETECTORS_WITH_DEDICATED_QUERY_INDICES.get(this.settings);
this.monitorService = new MonitorService(client);
this.workflowService = new WorkflowService(client, monitorService);

this.clusterService.getClusterSettings().addSettingsUpdateConsumer(SecurityAnalyticsSettings.FILTER_BY_BACKEND_ROLES, this::setFilterByEnabled);
this.clusterService.getClusterSettings().addSettingsUpdateConsumer(SecurityAnalyticsSettings.ENABLE_WORKFLOW_USAGE, this::setEnabledWorkflowUsage);
this.clusterService.getClusterSettings().addSettingsUpdateConsumer(SecurityAnalyticsSettings.ENABLE_DETECTORS_WITH_DEDICATED_QUERY_INDICES, this::setEnabledDetectorsWithDedicatedQueryIndices);
this.exceptionChecker = exceptionChecker;
}

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -793,7 +797,7 @@ private IndexMonitorRequest createDocLevelMonitorRequest(List<Pair<String, Rule>
detector.getAlertsHistoryIndex(),
detector.getAlertsHistoryIndexPattern(),
DetectorMonitorConfig.getRuleIndexMappingsByType(),
true), PLUGIN_OWNER_FIELD);
true), enableDetectorWithDedicatedQueryIndices, PLUGIN_OWNER_FIELD);

return new IndexMonitorRequest(monitorId, SequenceNumbers.UNASSIGNED_SEQ_NO, SequenceNumbers.UNASSIGNED_PRIMARY_TERM, refreshPolicy, restMethod, monitor, null);
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -887,14 +891,14 @@ private IndexMonitorRequest createDocLevelMonitorMatchAllRequest(

Monitor monitor = new Monitor(monitorId, Monitor.NO_VERSION, monitorName, false, detector.getSchedule(), detector.getLastUpdateTime(), null,
Monitor.MonitorType.DOC_LEVEL_MONITOR.getValue(), detector.getUser(), 1, docLevelMonitorInputs, triggers, Map.of(),
new DataSources(detector.getRuleIndex(),
new DataSources(enableDetectorWithDedicatedQueryIndices? detector.getRuleIndex() + "_chained_findings": detector.getRuleIndex(),
detector.getFindingsIndex(),
detector.getFindingsIndexPattern(),
detector.getAlertsIndex(),
detector.getAlertsHistoryIndex(),
detector.getAlertsHistoryIndexPattern(),
DetectorMonitorConfig.getRuleIndexMappingsByType(),
true), PLUGIN_OWNER_FIELD);
true), enableDetectorWithDedicatedQueryIndices, PLUGIN_OWNER_FIELD);

return new IndexMonitorRequest(monitorId, SequenceNumbers.UNASSIGNED_SEQ_NO, SequenceNumbers.UNASSIGNED_PRIMARY_TERM, refreshPolicy, restMethod, monitor, null);
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1068,7 +1072,7 @@ public void onResponse(GetIndexMappingsResponse getIndexMappingsResponse) {
detector.getAlertsHistoryIndex(),
detector.getAlertsHistoryIndexPattern(),
DetectorMonitorConfig.getRuleIndexMappingsByType(),
true), PLUGIN_OWNER_FIELD);
true), false, PLUGIN_OWNER_FIELD);

listener.onResponse(new IndexMonitorRequest(monitorId, SequenceNumbers.UNASSIGNED_SEQ_NO, SequenceNumbers.UNASSIGNED_PRIMARY_TERM, refreshPolicy, restMethod, monitor, null));
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1252,7 +1256,13 @@ void createDetector() {
request.getDetector().setAlertsHistoryIndexPattern(DetectorMonitorConfig.getAlertsHistoryIndexPattern(ruleTopic));
request.getDetector().setFindingsIndex(DetectorMonitorConfig.getFindingsIndex(ruleTopic));
request.getDetector().setFindingsIndexPattern(DetectorMonitorConfig.getFindingsIndexPattern(ruleTopic));
request.getDetector().setRuleIndex(DetectorMonitorConfig.getRuleIndex(ruleTopic));

if (enableDetectorWithDedicatedQueryIndices) {
request.getDetector().setRuleIndex(DetectorMonitorConfig.getRuleIndexOptimized(ruleTopic));
} else {
String ruleTopicIndex = DetectorMonitorConfig.getRuleIndex(ruleTopic);
request.getDetector().setRuleIndex(ruleTopicIndex.substring(0, ruleTopicIndex.length()-1));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why did we change the existing code from
request.getDetector().setRuleIndex(DetectorMonitorConfig.getRuleIndex(ruleTopic));

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ruleIndex is changing to dedicated ruleIndexOptimzied now. Thats why if-else condition.

}

User originalContextUser = this.user;
log.debug("user from original context is {}", originalContextUser);
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1369,7 +1379,16 @@ void onGetResponse(Detector currentDetector, User user) {
request.getDetector().setAlertsHistoryIndexPattern(DetectorMonitorConfig.getAlertsHistoryIndexPattern(ruleTopic));
request.getDetector().setFindingsIndex(DetectorMonitorConfig.getFindingsIndex(ruleTopic));
request.getDetector().setFindingsIndexPattern(DetectorMonitorConfig.getFindingsIndexPattern(ruleTopic));
request.getDetector().setRuleIndex(DetectorMonitorConfig.getRuleIndex(ruleTopic));
if (currentDetector.getRuleIndex().contains("optimized")) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if name contains optimized shouldn't we set rule index name as getRuleIndexOptimized value?

is this if else condition flipped?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the if-else condition checks if the detector is already using a dedicated query index, then keep on using it. else, switch from shared query index to new dedicated query index as the detector is updated.

request.getDetector().setRuleIndex(currentDetector.getRuleIndex());
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

plz add comment that if we turn OFF setting after turning on, updating detector will not change from optimized to normal and we need to re-create detector

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added a comment. added a test too.

} else {
if (enableDetectorWithDedicatedQueryIndices) {
request.getDetector().setRuleIndex(DetectorMonitorConfig.getRuleIndexOptimized(ruleTopic));
} else {
String ruleTopicIndex = DetectorMonitorConfig.getRuleIndex(ruleTopic);
request.getDetector().setRuleIndex(ruleTopicIndex.substring(0, ruleTopicIndex.length() - 1));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this line is very confusing

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed it.

}
}
request.getDetector().setUser(user);

if (!detector.getInputs().isEmpty()) {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1805,4 +1824,8 @@ private void setFilterByEnabled(boolean filterByEnabled) {
private void setEnabledWorkflowUsage(boolean enabledWorkflowUsage) {
this.enabledWorkflowUsage = enabledWorkflowUsage;
}

private void setEnabledDetectorsWithDedicatedQueryIndices(boolean enabledDetectorsWithDedicatedQueryIndices) {
this.enableDetectorWithDedicatedQueryIndices = enabledDetectorsWithDedicatedQueryIndices;
}
}
6 changes: 1 addition & 5 deletions src/main/java/org/opensearch/securityanalytics/util/RuleTopicIndices.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -46,13 +46,9 @@ public static String ruleTopicIndexSettings() throws IOException {
public void initRuleTopicIndexTemplate(ActionListener<AcknowledgedResponse> actionListener) throws IOException {
getAllRuleIndices(ActionListener.wrap(allRuleIndices -> {
// Compose list of all patterns to cover all query indices
List<String> indexPatterns = new ArrayList<>();
for(String ruleIndex : allRuleIndices) {
indexPatterns.add(ruleIndex + "*");
}

ComposableIndexTemplate template = new ComposableIndexTemplate(
indexPatterns,
allRuleIndices,
new Template(
Settings.builder().loadFromSource(ruleTopicIndexSettings(), XContentType.JSON).build(),
null,
Expand Down
91 changes: 7 additions & 84 deletions src/test/java/org/opensearch/securityanalytics/DetectorThreatIntelIT.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -69,22 +69,11 @@ public void testCreateDetectorWithThreatIntelEnabled_updateDetectorWithThreatInt
Detector detector = randomDetectorWithInputsAndThreatIntelAndTriggers(List.of(input), true, List.of(trigger));
Response createResponse = makeRequest(client(), "POST", SecurityAnalyticsPlugin.DETECTOR_BASE_URI, Collections.emptyMap(), toHttpEntity(detector));

String request = "{\n" +
" \"query\" : {\n" +
" \"match_all\":{\n" +
" }\n" +
" }\n" +
"}";
SearchResponse response = executeSearchAndGetResponse(DetectorMonitorConfig.getRuleIndex(randomDetectorType()), request, true);
Copy link
Member

@eirsep eirsep Sep 25, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why has this been removed ?

Plz dont reduce test coverage..
fix test as necessary

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

query indices are created & deleted now. So, it is difficult to assert number of queries in query index now.



assertEquals(2, response.getHits().getTotalHits().value);

assertEquals("Create detector failed", RestStatus.CREATED, restStatus(createResponse));
Map<String, Object> responseBody = asMap(createResponse);

String detectorId = responseBody.get("_id").toString();
request = "{\n" +
String request = "{\n" +
" \"query\" : {\n" +
" \"match\":{\n" +
" \"_id\": \"" + detectorId + "\"\n" +
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -269,22 +258,11 @@ public void testCreateDetectorWithThreatIntelDisabled_updateDetectorWithThreatIn
Detector detector = randomDetectorWithInputsAndThreatIntel(List.of(input), false);
Response createResponse = makeRequest(client(), "POST", SecurityAnalyticsPlugin.DETECTOR_BASE_URI, Collections.emptyMap(), toHttpEntity(detector));

String request = "{\n" +
" \"query\" : {\n" +
" \"match_all\":{\n" +
" }\n" +
" }\n" +
"}";
SearchResponse response = executeSearchAndGetResponse(DetectorMonitorConfig.getRuleIndex(randomDetectorType()), request, true);


assertEquals(1, response.getHits().getTotalHits().value);

assertEquals("Create detector failed", RestStatus.CREATED, restStatus(createResponse));
Map<String, Object> responseBody = asMap(createResponse);

String detectorId = responseBody.get("_id").toString();
request = "{\n" +
String request = "{\n" +
" \"query\" : {\n" +
" \"match\":{\n" +
" \"_id\": \"" + detectorId + "\"\n" +
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -366,22 +344,11 @@ public void testCreateDetectorWithThreatIntelEnabledAndNoRules_triggerDetectionT
Detector detector = randomDetectorWithInputsAndThreatIntelAndTriggers(List.of(input), true, List.of(trigger));
Response createResponse = makeRequest(client(), "POST", SecurityAnalyticsPlugin.DETECTOR_BASE_URI, Collections.emptyMap(), toHttpEntity(detector));

String request = "{\n" +
" \"query\" : {\n" +
" \"match_all\":{\n" +
" }\n" +
" }\n" +
"}";
SearchResponse response = executeSearchAndGetResponse(DetectorMonitorConfig.getRuleIndex(randomDetectorType()), request, true);


assertEquals(1, response.getHits().getTotalHits().value);

assertEquals("Create detector failed", RestStatus.CREATED, restStatus(createResponse));
Map<String, Object> responseBody = asMap(createResponse);

String detectorId = responseBody.get("_id").toString();
request = "{\n" +
String request = "{\n" +
" \"query\" : {\n" +
" \"match\":{\n" +
" \"_id\": \"" + detectorId + "\"\n" +
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -460,22 +427,11 @@ public void testCreateDetectorWithThreatIntelEnabled_triggerDetectionTypeOnlyThr
Detector detector = randomDetectorWithInputsAndThreatIntelAndTriggers(List.of(input), true, List.of(trigger));
Response createResponse = makeRequest(client(), "POST", SecurityAnalyticsPlugin.DETECTOR_BASE_URI, Collections.emptyMap(), toHttpEntity(detector));

String request = "{\n" +
" \"query\" : {\n" +
" \"match_all\":{\n" +
" }\n" +
" }\n" +
"}";
SearchResponse response = executeSearchAndGetResponse(DetectorMonitorConfig.getRuleIndex(randomDetectorType()), request, true);


assertEquals(1, response.getHits().getTotalHits().value);

assertEquals("Create detector failed", RestStatus.CREATED, restStatus(createResponse));
Map<String, Object> responseBody = asMap(createResponse);

String detectorId = responseBody.get("_id").toString();
request = "{\n" +
String request = "{\n" +
" \"query\" : {\n" +
" \"match\":{\n" +
" \"_id\": \"" + detectorId + "\"\n" +
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -555,22 +511,11 @@ public void testCreateDetectorWithThreatIntelEnabled_triggerWithBothDetectionTyp
Detector detector = randomDetectorWithInputsAndThreatIntelAndTriggers(List.of(input), true, List.of(trigger));
Response createResponse = makeRequest(client(), "POST", SecurityAnalyticsPlugin.DETECTOR_BASE_URI, Collections.emptyMap(), toHttpEntity(detector));

String request = "{\n" +
" \"query\" : {\n" +
" \"match_all\":{\n" +
" }\n" +
" }\n" +
"}";
SearchResponse response = executeSearchAndGetResponse(DetectorMonitorConfig.getRuleIndex(randomDetectorType()), request, true);


assertEquals(1, response.getHits().getTotalHits().value);

assertEquals("Create detector failed", RestStatus.CREATED, restStatus(createResponse));
Map<String, Object> responseBody = asMap(createResponse);

String detectorId = responseBody.get("_id").toString();
request = "{\n" +
String request = "{\n" +
" \"query\" : {\n" +
" \"match\":{\n" +
" \"_id\": \"" + detectorId + "\"\n" +
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -647,22 +592,11 @@ public void testCreateDetectorWithThreatIntelDisabled_triggerWithThreatIntelDete
Detector detector = randomDetectorWithInputsAndThreatIntelAndTriggers(List.of(input), false, List.of(trigger));
Response createResponse = makeRequest(client(), "POST", SecurityAnalyticsPlugin.DETECTOR_BASE_URI, Collections.emptyMap(), toHttpEntity(detector));

String request = "{\n" +
" \"query\" : {\n" +
" \"match_all\":{\n" +
" }\n" +
" }\n" +
"}";
SearchResponse response = executeSearchAndGetResponse(DetectorMonitorConfig.getRuleIndex(randomDetectorType()), request, true);


assertEquals(1, response.getHits().getTotalHits().value);

assertEquals("Create detector failed", RestStatus.CREATED, restStatus(createResponse));
Map<String, Object> responseBody = asMap(createResponse);

String detectorId = responseBody.get("_id").toString();
request = "{\n" +
String request = "{\n" +
" \"query\" : {\n" +
" \"match\":{\n" +
" \"_id\": \"" + detectorId + "\"\n" +
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -739,22 +673,11 @@ public void testCreateDetectorWithThreatIntelDisabled_triggerWithRulesDetectionT
Detector detector = randomDetectorWithInputsAndThreatIntelAndTriggers(List.of(input), false, List.of(trigger));
Response createResponse = makeRequest(client(), "POST", SecurityAnalyticsPlugin.DETECTOR_BASE_URI, Collections.emptyMap(), toHttpEntity(detector));

String request = "{\n" +
" \"query\" : {\n" +
" \"match_all\":{\n" +
" }\n" +
" }\n" +
"}";
SearchResponse response = executeSearchAndGetResponse(DetectorMonitorConfig.getRuleIndex(randomDetectorType()), request, true);


assertEquals(1, response.getHits().getTotalHits().value);

assertEquals("Create detector failed", RestStatus.CREATED, restStatus(createResponse));
Map<String, Object> responseBody = asMap(createResponse);

String detectorId = responseBody.get("_id").toString();
request = "{\n" +
String request = "{\n" +
" \"query\" : {\n" +
" \"match\":{\n" +
" \"_id\": \"" + detectorId + "\"\n" +
Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions src/test/java/org/opensearch/securityanalytics/SecurityAnalyticsRestTestCase.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ void setDebugLogLevel() throws IOException, InterruptedException {


makeRequest(client(), "PUT", "_cluster/settings", Collections.emptyMap(), se, new BasicHeader("Content-Type", "application/json"));
updateClusterSetting("plugins.security_analytics.enable_detectors_with_dedicated_query_indices", "true");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

are there tests with setting turned off

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added a test for setting turned off.

}

protected final List<String> clusterPermissions = List.of(
Expand Down
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions src/test/java/org/opensearch/securityanalytics/alerts/AlertingServiceTests.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ public void testGetAlerts_success() {
List.of(),
Map.of(),
new DataSources(),
true,
TransportIndexDetectorAction.PLUGIN_OWNER_FIELD
),
new DocumentLevelTrigger("trigger_id_1", "my_trigger", "severity_low", List.of(), new Script("")),
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -129,6 +130,7 @@ public void testGetAlerts_success() {
List.of(),
Map.of(),
new DataSources(),
true,
TransportIndexDetectorAction.PLUGIN_OWNER_FIELD
),
new DocumentLevelTrigger("trigger_id_1", "my_trigger", "severity_low", List.of(), new Script("")),
Expand Down
Loading
Loading