Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable label handling for integ-test workflows #4400

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 6, 2024

Conversation

gaiksaya
Copy link
Member

@gaiksaya gaiksaya commented Feb 3, 2024

Description

This change includes below changes:

  1. Creates a generic issue for a component:version integ-test failures
  2. Adds/Removes labels based on platform:distribution:architecture

Also, Won't close the issue as these workflows are async. Hence, needs manual closure once an issue is fixed.

Issues Resolved

resolves #4358

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Signed-off-by: Sayali Gaikawad <[email protected]>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (8fb53d1) 91.35% compared to head (29b444d) 91.35%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4400   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.35%   91.35%           
=======================================
  Files         190      190           
  Lines        6197     6197           
=======================================
  Hits         5661     5661           
  Misses        536      536           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

label: "autocut,v${version},integ-test-failure"
)
issueTitle: "[AUTOCUT] Integration Test failed for ${local_component}: ${version}",
label: "${platform}:${distribution}:${architecture}",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but we need to observe "${platform}:${distribution}:${architecture}", how does this look and work with search API's in GitHub, we can also always come back change.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see! Sounds good. Let me know if there is someplace I need to keep watch.

@gaiksaya gaiksaya merged commit c47987e into opensearch-project:main Feb 6, 2024
13 checks passed
@gaiksaya gaiksaya deleted the labelling branch February 6, 2024 18:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Optimize integration test failure issue creation
2 participants