-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 127
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Integration with base OpenSearch 2.0 #328
Merged
martin-gaievski
merged 9 commits into
opensearch-project:main
from
martin-gaievski:integrate/opensearch20-lucene91
Mar 28, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e9a19ed
Initial integration with OS 2.0 Alpha1
martin-gaievski 05c3989
Apply spotless
martin-gaievski a9ddc3a
Refactor codec and doc format classes for Lucene 9.1
martin-gaievski 13f075d
Adding java doc to some java classes to kickoff new build
martin-gaievski 82a05ff
Reorginize factory and facade code, minor review comments
martin-gaievski ee411d5
Rebase on main, switch to base 2.0 alpha1 snapshot using new approach
martin-gaievski c62a0a9
Reverting logic of setting plugin mappings
martin-gaievski 7550e97
Adding unit tests, fix license headers
martin-gaievski 98f1264
Switch to x.x.x versioning for codecs and doc value format
martin-gaievski File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
instance type check?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's an old code, probably formatted by spotless. But I agree that the check is missing. Let me add it in next commit
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would say dont add it in this PR. We can fix later. This was changed due to spotless.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@martin-gaievski I agree to @jmazanec15's comment. Shall we make one huge ( with caution ) spotless apply PR, so that it will not be a problem every-time we touch the code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, let's leave it and address in later PR. Please approve @VijayanB if that was the only comment from your side.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@VijayanB I set https://github.com/opensearch-project/k-NN/blob/main/gradle/formatting.gradle#L10 the ratchet from setting to apply spotless incrementally to avoid messing us the git history with a huge commit that changes everything. I have been thinking about removing this and doing a big sptless apply. We can probably discuss in an issue I can create.