Publish only ZIP artifacts since the plugin has no xxx-client counterpart

[reta]

Description

Publish only ZIP artifacts since the plugin has no xxx-client counterpart

$ ./scripts/build.sh -s true -v 3.0.0

$ tree build/local-staging-repo/org/opensearch/
build/local-staging-repo/org/opensearch/
└── plugin
    └── opensearch-custom-codecs
        ├── 3.0.0.0-SNAPSHOT
        │   ├── maven-metadata.xml
        │   ├── maven-metadata.xml.md5
        │   ├── maven-metadata.xml.sha1
        │   ├── maven-metadata.xml.sha256
        │   ├── maven-metadata.xml.sha512
        │   ├── opensearch-custom-codecs-3.0.0.0-20231004.151629-1.pom
        │   ├── opensearch-custom-codecs-3.0.0.0-20231004.151629-1.pom.md5
        │   ├── opensearch-custom-codecs-3.0.0.0-20231004.151629-1.pom.sha1
        │   ├── opensearch-custom-codecs-3.0.0.0-20231004.151629-1.pom.sha256
        │   ├── opensearch-custom-codecs-3.0.0.0-20231004.151629-1.pom.sha512
        │   ├── opensearch-custom-codecs-3.0.0.0-20231004.151629-1.zip
        │   ├── opensearch-custom-codecs-3.0.0.0-20231004.151629-1.zip.md5
        │   ├── opensearch-custom-codecs-3.0.0.0-20231004.151629-1.zip.sha1
        │   ├── opensearch-custom-codecs-3.0.0.0-20231004.151629-1.zip.sha256
        │   └── opensearch-custom-codecs-3.0.0.0-20231004.151629-1.zip.sha512
        ├── maven-metadata.xml
        ├── maven-metadata.xml.md5
        ├── maven-metadata.xml.sha1
        ├── maven-metadata.xml.sha256
        └── maven-metadata.xml.sha512

Issues Resolved

Closes #68

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

[reta]

@gaiksaya fyi

[gaiksaya]

@gaiksaya fyi

Hi @reta ,

The problematic pom was /org/opensearch/opensearch-custom-codecs/2.10.0.0/opensearch-custom-codecs-2.10.0.0.pom

The one with the plugin path in it was fine. Adding @prudhvigodithi here who helped me to fix this.

[reta]

The problematic pom was /org/opensearch/opensearch-custom-codecs/2.10.0.0/opensearch-custom-codecs-2.10.0.0.pom

Correct @gaiksaya , it is gone now, we don't need to publish this JAR

[prudhvigodithi]

Hey @reta apart from what @gaiksaya said, lets not remove the jar publish as some users might directly use the Jar (import) and move forward with the development or use the jar to address dependencies. Example I can directly use the https://aws.oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/releases/org/opensearch/opensearch-custom-codecs/2.10.0.0/

mvn org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-dependency-plugin:2.1:get -DrepoUrl=https://aws.oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/releases/ -Dartifact=org.opensearch:opensearch-custom-codecs:2.10.0.0
Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dlog4j2.formatMsgNoLookups=true
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO] 
[INFO] ------------------< org.apache.maven:standalone-pom >-------------------
[INFO] Building Maven Stub Project (No POM) 1
[INFO] --------------------------------[ pom ]---------------------------------
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-dependency-plugin:2.1:get (default-cli) @ standalone-pom ---
Downloading from central: https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/opensearch/opensearch-custom-codecs/2.10.0.0/opensearch-custom-codecs-2.10.0.0.jar
Downloaded from central: https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/opensearch/opensearch-custom-codecs/2.10.0.0/opensearch-custom-codecs-2.10.0.0.jar (27 kB at 72 kB/s)
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time:  0.800 s
[INFO] Finished at: 2023-10-04T10:15:10-07:00
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------

WDYT?
@bbarani @peterzhuamazon

[reta]

Hey @reta apart from what @gaiksaya said, lets not remove the jar publish as some users might directly use the Jar (import) and move forward with the development or use the jar to address dependencies.

Hey @prudhvigodithi , there is absolutely no need to use this JAR, some plugins do have xxx-client artifacts, this plugin has not, we should not publish just JAR for no reason.

[prudhvigodithi]

Hey @prudhvigodithi , there is absolutely no need to use this JAR, some plugins do have xxx-client artifacts, this plugin has not, we should not publish just JAR for no reason.

Sure @reta just bought it up to ensure we dont impact users who use jars.

[reta]

Sure @reta just bought it up to ensure we dont impact users who use jars.

Thanks @prudhvigodithi , I see no circumstances under which the JAR could be useful as it is now.

[reta]

@andrross need your signoff please