Enhanced status API validations to check for index name

[saikaranam-amazon]

Signed-off-by: Sai Kumar [email protected]

Description

Enhanced status API validations to check for index name

GET _plugins/_replication//_status?pretty" 

{
  "error" : {
    "root_cause" : [
      {
        "type" : "action_request_validation_exception",
        "reason" : "Validation Failed: 1: Index name should be specified to obtain replication status;"
      }
    ],
    "type" : "action_request_validation_exception",
    "reason" : "Validation Failed: 1: Index name should be specified to obtain replication status;"
  },
  "status" : 400
}

Issues Resolved

#314

Check List

• New functionality includes testing.
  • All tests pass
• New functionality has been documented.
  • New functionality has javadoc added
• Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #317 (a6e4193) into main (f309eaa) will decrease coverage by 1.40%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head a6e4193 differs from pull request most recent head 275e380. Consider uploading reports for the commit 275e380 to get more accurate results

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #317      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     72.94%   71.53%   -1.41%     
+ Complexity      905      897       -8     
============================================
  Files           139      139              
  Lines          4424     4427       +3     
  Branches        519      521       +2     
============================================
- Hits           3227     3167      -60     
- Misses          870      934      +64     
+ Partials        327      326       -1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...arch/replication/action/status/ShardInfoRequest.kt	78.94% <100.00%> (+3.94%)	⬆️
...earch/replication/rest/ReplicationStatusHandler.kt	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ication/action/setup/TransportSetupChecksAction.kt	58.62% <0.00%> (-13.80%)	⬇️
...ch/replication/task/index/IndexReplicationState.kt	48.33% <0.00%> (-13.34%)	⬇️
...ication/seqno/RemoteClusterRetentionLeaseHelper.kt	80.00% <0.00%> (-11.67%)	⬇️
...tion/repository/RemoteClusterMultiChunkTransfer.kt	70.73% <0.00%> (-9.76%)	⬇️
...ication/action/stats/TransportLeaderStatsAction.kt	70.83% <0.00%> (-8.34%)	⬇️
.../replication/metadata/store/ReplicationMetadata.kt	75.32% <0.00%> (-6.50%)	⬇️
...action/stop/TransportStopIndexReplicationAction.kt	70.00% <0.00%> (-5.72%)	⬇️
...ication/action/stop/StopIndexReplicationRequest.kt	57.89% <0.00%> (-5.27%)	⬇️
... and 16 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f309eaa...275e380. Read the comment docs.

[saikaranam-amazon]

Integ tests fixed in: #322

[ankitkala]

LGTM