Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Drop support for JDK 14. #346

Closed
Tracked by #132
dblock opened this issue Mar 30, 2022 · 0 comments
Closed
Tracked by #132

Drop support for JDK 14. #346

dblock opened this issue Mar 30, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
@naveenpajjuri
Labels
v2.0.0

Comments

@dblock
Copy link
Member

dblock commented Mar 30, 2022

Coming from opensearch-project/opensearch-plugins#132, remove support for JDK 14.

In OpenSearch 2.0 we are building the complete distribution and every component with JDK 11, and testing and bundling JDK 17. Support for JDK 14, 15 and other non-LTS versions can be dropped. Remove building and testing with these JDKs from CI.

See https://opensearch.org/blog/technical-post/2022/03/opensearch-java-runtime/ for more information.
@dblock dblock added the v2.0.0 label Mar 30, 2022
@dblock dblock mentioned this issue Mar 30, 2022
Closed
14 tasks
@naveenpajjuri naveenpajjuri self-assigned this Apr 5, 2022
naveenpajjuri pushed a commit to naveenpajjuri/cross-cluster-replication that referenced this issue Apr 5, 2022
removed jdk 14 support (opensearch-project#346).
a8d935d 
Signed-off-by: Naveen Pajjuri <[email protected]>
@naveenpajjuri naveenpajjuri mentioned this issue Apr 5, 2022
Merged
5 tasks
naveenpajjuri pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 5, 2022
@naveenpajjuri
removed jdk 14 support (#346).
d5318e6 
Signed-off-by: Naveen Pajjuri <[email protected]>
@ankitkala ankitkala mentioned this issue May 17, 2022
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@naveenpajjuri naveenpajjuri

Labels
v2.0.0
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@dblock @naveenpajjuri