Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 2.1] Staging for version increment automation #210

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 16, 2022

Conversation

opensearch-trigger-bot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport 366bf16 from #200

@opensearch-trigger-bot opensearch-trigger-bot bot requested a review from a team July 27, 2022 00:45
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 27, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #210 (8b748a7) into 2.1 (215cd12) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##                2.1     #210   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     83.76%   83.76%           
  Complexity      434      434           
=========================================
  Files            66       66           
  Lines          2205     2205           
  Branches        254      254           
=========================================
  Hits           1847     1847           
  Misses          261      261           
  Partials         97       97           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us.

* Version increment automation

Signed-off-by: pgodithi <[email protected]>

* Version increment automation: task rename updateVersion

Signed-off-by: pgodithi <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 366bf16)
Signed-off-by: prudhvigodithi <[email protected]>
@prudhvigodithi prudhvigodithi force-pushed the backport/backport-200-to-2.1 branch from afcbf46 to 8b748a7 Compare July 27, 2022 14:16
@dblock dblock merged commit e67c9a3 into 2.1 Aug 16, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the backport/backport-200-to-2.1 branch August 16, 2022 16:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants