Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make CU hosts its own script before delete the one on build repo #152

Conversation

peterzhuamazon
Copy link
Member

@peterzhuamazon peterzhuamazon commented Mar 31, 2022

Signed-off-by: Peter Zhu [email protected]

Description

Make CU hosts its own script before delete the one on build repo

We have 2 CU build script, one in build repo one in CU repo.
Our code base define that build repo script take priority over the CU repo script.
It would be better for CU to host their own build script in CU repo.

This is a pre-requisite to keep both script consistent before we remove the build script from build repo.

Example existing calls:

2022-03-31 22:32:38 INFO     Executing "bash /var/jenkins/workspace/distribution-build-opensearch/scripts/components/common-utils/build.sh -v 2.0.0 -q alpha1 -p linux -a arm64 -s false -o builds" in /tmp/tmpvo10muhh/common-utils

Issues Resolved

#131

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing.
    • All tests pass
  • New functionality has been documented.
    • New functionality has javadoc added
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

@peterzhuamazon peterzhuamazon merged commit 58cd7cc into opensearch-project:main Apr 1, 2022
@peterzhuamazon peterzhuamazon deleted the opensearch-2.0.0-qualifier-default-3 branch April 1, 2022 02:18
zelinh pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2022
wuychn pushed a commit to ochprince/common-utils that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants