-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 73
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Visualization integration RFC docs #477
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Tyler Ohlsen <[email protected]>
@brijos @sean-zheng-amazon let me know if you have any other suggestions for the doc, thanks! |
Signed-off-by: Tyler Ohlsen <[email protected]>
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #477 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 78.15% 78.07% -0.08%
Complexity 4158 4158
============================================
Files 296 296
Lines 17659 17659
Branches 1879 1879
============================================
- Hits 13801 13787 -14
- Misses 2961 2977 +16
+ Partials 897 895 -2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
| `category_field` | Default to empty. If user has x-axis terms subaggregation set, could auto-fill with that field | | ||
| `result_index` | Use some default value (none) | | ||
| `shingle_size` | Use some default value (8) | | ||
| real-time / historical jobs? | Default to real-time enabled, historical disabled | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it possible to run historical analysis on the visualization data as well? It's hard to tell whether the user's data stream is realtime or not. Detect the data shown on the visualization can give user quick overview about how the auto created detector performs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, lots of options there. From workflow chart, I currently have the 'detect existing anomalies based on viz' use case covered by historical analysis.
Btw, we can use the RFC issue #476 for further discussion - this PR is just to persist the doc into docs/
dir like we've done for previous projects.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. We can discuss more questions on the Github issue.
@ylwu-amzn @amitgalitz updated issue: #476 |
Signed-off-by: Tyler Ohlsen [email protected]
Description
Adds docs for the AD-Visualization integration project RFC. Will link this doc in the RFC issue that will be shared around (#476)
Check List
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.