-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix flaky test testDropPrimaryDuringReplication. #8715
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This change fixes testDropPrimaryDuringReplication and an edge case where after an updateSegments call on NRTReplicationReaderManager the reader is not actually refreshed because of another concurrent refresh call. Fixes by using a blocking refresh and removes unnecessary synchronization around the updatesegments method to avoid a deadlock case where the concurrent refresh picks up the new segments but is unable to acquire the object monitor to refresh internally in ReferenceManager.swapReference. Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]>
mch2
requested review from
reta,
anasalkouz,
andrross,
Bukhtawar,
CEHENKLE,
dblock,
gbbafna,
setiah,
kartg,
kotwanikunal,
nknize,
owaiskazi19,
Rishikesh1159,
ryanbogan,
saratvemulapalli,
shwetathareja,
dreamer-89,
tlfeng,
VachaShah,
dbwiddis and
sachinpkale
as code owners
July 17, 2023 08:06
Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:
|
|
Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:
|
dreamer-89
reviewed
Jul 17, 2023
server/src/main/java/org/opensearch/index/engine/NRTReplicationReaderManager.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
server/src/test/java/org/opensearch/index/engine/NRTReplicationReaderManagerTests.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
dreamer-89
approved these changes
Jul 17, 2023
server/src/main/java/org/opensearch/index/engine/NRTReplicationReaderManager.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
opensearch-trigger-bot bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2023
This change fixes testDropPrimaryDuringReplication and an edge case where after an updateSegments call on NRTReplicationReaderManager the reader is not actually refreshed because of another concurrent refresh call. Fixes by using a blocking refresh and removes unnecessary synchronization around the updatesegments method to avoid a deadlock case where the concurrent refresh picks up the new segments but is unable to acquire the object monitor to refresh internally in ReferenceManager.swapReference. Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 7642e43) Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
mch2
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2023
This change fixes testDropPrimaryDuringReplication and an edge case where after an updateSegments call on NRTReplicationReaderManager the reader is not actually refreshed because of another concurrent refresh call. Fixes by using a blocking refresh and removes unnecessary synchronization around the updatesegments method to avoid a deadlock case where the concurrent refresh picks up the new segments but is unable to acquire the object monitor to refresh internally in ReferenceManager.swapReference. (cherry picked from commit 7642e43) Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
suranjay
pushed a commit
to suranjay/OpenSearch
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2023
…8715) This change fixes testDropPrimaryDuringReplication and an edge case where after an updateSegments call on NRTReplicationReaderManager the reader is not actually refreshed because of another concurrent refresh call. Fixes by using a blocking refresh and removes unnecessary synchronization around the updatesegments method to avoid a deadlock case where the concurrent refresh picks up the new segments but is unable to acquire the object monitor to refresh internally in ReferenceManager.swapReference. Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]>
6 tasks
6 tasks
baba-devv
pushed a commit
to baba-devv/OpenSearch
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2023
…8715) This change fixes testDropPrimaryDuringReplication and an edge case where after an updateSegments call on NRTReplicationReaderManager the reader is not actually refreshed because of another concurrent refresh call. Fixes by using a blocking refresh and removes unnecessary synchronization around the updatesegments method to avoid a deadlock case where the concurrent refresh picks up the new segments but is unable to acquire the object monitor to refresh internally in ReferenceManager.swapReference. Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]>
kaushalmahi12
pushed a commit
to kaushalmahi12/OpenSearch
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2023
…8715) This change fixes testDropPrimaryDuringReplication and an edge case where after an updateSegments call on NRTReplicationReaderManager the reader is not actually refreshed because of another concurrent refresh call. Fixes by using a blocking refresh and removes unnecessary synchronization around the updatesegments method to avoid a deadlock case where the concurrent refresh picks up the new segments but is unable to acquire the object monitor to refresh internally in ReferenceManager.swapReference. Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kaushal Kumar <[email protected]>
shiv0408
pushed a commit
to Gaurav614/OpenSearch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2024
…8715) This change fixes testDropPrimaryDuringReplication and an edge case where after an updateSegments call on NRTReplicationReaderManager the reader is not actually refreshed because of another concurrent refresh call. Fixes by using a blocking refresh and removes unnecessary synchronization around the updatesegments method to avoid a deadlock case where the concurrent refresh picks up the new segments but is unable to acquire the object monitor to refresh internally in ReferenceManager.swapReference. Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Shivansh Arora <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This change fixes flaky test testDropPrimaryDuringReplication. This test would hit an edge case where after an updateSegments call on NRTReplicationReaderManager the reader is not actually refreshed because of another concurrent refresh call. Fixes by using a blocking refresh during updateSegments to ensure a refresh has happened. This also removes unnecessary synchronization on the updateSegments method. This is to avoid a deadlock case where the concurrent refresh picks up the new segments but is unable to acquire the object monitor to refresh internally in ReferenceManager.swapReference.
Related Issues
resolves #8059
Check List
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.