Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate Map, List, and Set in org.opensearch.common.collect (#6609)… #6687

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 16, 2023

Conversation

kotwanikunal
Copy link
Member

… (#6631)

Signed-off-by: Dilip Roshitha [email protected]

Signed-off-by: Dilip Roshitha [email protected]

Signed-off-by: Dilip Roshitha [email protected]


Signed-off-by: Dilip Roshitha [email protected]
(cherry picked from commit defcdf9)

Description

Issues Resolved

  • N/A

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing.
    • All tests pass
  • New functionality has been documented.
    • New functionality has javadoc added
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff
  • Commit changes are listed out in CHANGELOG.md file (See: Changelog)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

…arch-project#6609) (opensearch-project#6631)

* Deprecate Map, List, and Set in org.opensearch.common.collect (opensearch-project#6609)

Signed-off-by: Dilip Roshitha <[email protected]>

* Deprecate Map, List, and Set in org.opensearch.common.collect - PR review points (opensearch-project#6609)

Signed-off-by: Dilip Roshitha <[email protected]>

* Deprecate Map, List, and Set in org.opensearch.common.collect - removed associated tests (opensearch-project#6609)

Signed-off-by: Dilip Roshitha <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Dilip Roshitha <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit defcdf9)
@kotwanikunal
Copy link
Member Author

The fix for the whitesource issue is at: #6629
Still awaiting release.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #6687 (ff88815) into main (2ebd644) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 77.77%.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #6687      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     70.80%   70.78%   -0.02%     
+ Complexity    59219    59216       -3     
============================================
  Files          4808     4808              
  Lines        283454   283440      -14     
  Branches      40868    40868              
============================================
- Hits         200691   200625      -66     
- Misses        66268    66353      +85     
+ Partials      16495    16462      -33     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...ucket/terms/StringTermsSerializationBenchmark.java 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
.../main/java/org/opensearch/common/collect/List.java 0.00% <ø> (-83.34%) ⬇️
...c/main/java/org/opensearch/common/collect/Map.java 0.00% <ø> (-93.34%) ⬇️
...c/main/java/org/opensearch/common/collect/Set.java 0.00% <ø> (-83.34%) ⬇️
...opensearch/index/mapper/TokenCountFieldMapper.java 83.33% <0.00%> (ø)
.../opensearch/repositories/azure/AzureBlobStore.java 31.95% <0.00%> (-1.04%) ⬇️
...ries/gcs/GoogleCloudStorageHttpStatsCollector.java 96.77% <ø> (ø)
...repositories/gcs/GoogleCloudStorageRepository.java 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...h/cluster/metadata/MetadataCreateIndexService.java 78.04% <0.00%> (+0.37%) ⬆️
...cket/histogram/DateHistogramAggregatorFactory.java 94.44% <ø> (ø)
... and 40 more

... and 475 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@saratvemulapalli saratvemulapalli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is great, I like us moving away from custom pieces in OpenSearch :)

@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/),
- [Refactor] XContent base classes from xcontent to core library ([#5902](https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/pull/5902))

### Deprecated
- Map, List, and Set in org.opensearch.common.collect ([#6609](https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/pull/6609))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will be an invasive change across the project. Most plugins use these data structures[1].
I would take this opportunity to remove these implementations completely in 3.0 and have these deprecations in 2.x. Since we have the flexibility to make breaking changes in a new major. WDYT @reta @andrross @nknize

[1] https://github.com/search?q=org%3Aopensearch-project%20org.opensearch.common.collect&type=code

Copy link
Collaborator

@reta reta Mar 16, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@saratvemulapalli it makes sense but the only concern I have is how far are we from 3.0.0 release? We have to give people (plugin developers primarily) enough time to move off the deprecated APIs, if 3.0.0 is year from now - this is fine to deprecate + remove, if it is just few months - we should postpone removal to 4.0.0 I think.

Copy link
Member Author

@kotwanikunal kotwanikunal Mar 16, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These deprecations have already been merged as a part of 2.x. I am trying to get main in sync with those changes.
We can have a campaign for removal as a part of 3.0.0, if necessary. But I still think we need to merge this in to get the branches in sync first.

Copy link
Member

@saratvemulapalli saratvemulapalli Mar 16, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@reta from release schedule[1], looks like we are atleast 9-11 months away from 3.0.
@kotwanikunal absolutely, lets get this merged.

If all 3/other maintainers agree, could you create a campaign that these data structures will be removed?
Please Vote 👍🏻 👎🏻

[1] https://opensearch.org/releases.html

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will keep a track on the votes, but as per the current majority, I will create a campaign soon for this.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Campaign: #6786

@kotwanikunal kotwanikunal merged commit 4e45e44 into opensearch-project:main Mar 16, 2023
mingshl pushed a commit to mingshl/OpenSearch-Mingshl that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2023
…arch-project#6609) (opensearch-project#6631) (opensearch-project#6687)

* Deprecate Map, List, and Set in org.opensearch.common.collect (opensearch-project#6609)

Signed-off-by: Dilip Roshitha <[email protected]>

* Deprecate Map, List, and Set in org.opensearch.common.collect - PR review points (opensearch-project#6609)

Signed-off-by: Dilip Roshitha <[email protected]>

* Deprecate Map, List, and Set in org.opensearch.common.collect - removed associated tests (opensearch-project#6609)

Signed-off-by: Dilip Roshitha <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Dilip Roshitha <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit defcdf9)

Co-authored-by: Dilip Roshitha <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mingshi Liu <[email protected]>
@kotwanikunal kotwanikunal deleted the backport-6631 branch May 12, 2023 19:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants