Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 2.x] Support task resource tracking in OpenSearch #3021

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

opensearch-trigger-bot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport 6517eec from #2639

* Add Task id in Thread Context

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* Add resource tracking update support for tasks

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* List tasks action support for task resource refresh

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* Handle task unregistration case on same thread

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* Add lazy initialisation for RunnableTaskExecutionListener

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* Segregate resource tracking logic to a separate service.

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* Check for running threads during task unregister

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* Moved thread context logic to resource tracking service

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* preserve task id in thread context even after stash

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* Add null check for resource tracking service

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* Tracking service tests and minor refactoring

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* Preserve task id fix with test

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* Minor test changes and Task tracking call update

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* Fix Auto Queue executor method's signature

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* Make task runnable task listener factory implement consumer

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* Use reflection for ThreadMXBean

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* Formatting

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* Replace RunnableTaskExecutionListenerFactory with AtomicReference

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* Revert "Use reflection for ThreadMXBean"

This reverts commit cbcf3c525bf516fb7164f0221491a7b25c1f96ec.

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* Suppress Warning related to ThreadMXBean

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* Add separate method for task resource tracking supported check

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* Enabled setting by default

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* Add debug logs for stale context id

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* Remove hardcoded task overhead in tests

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* Bump stale task id in thread context log level to warn

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

* Improve assertions and logging

Signed-off-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Tushar Kharbanda <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 6517eec)
@opensearch-trigger-bot opensearch-trigger-bot bot requested a review from a team as a code owner April 21, 2022 13:52
@opensearch-ci-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

❌   Gradle Check failure ae4f4b2
Log 4676

Reports 4676

@dblock
Copy link
Member

dblock commented Apr 21, 2022

@tushar-kharbanda72 Care to take a look at the failure please?

Copy link
Member

@dblock dblock left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR introduces CI failures, is being reverted in #3046, cc: @tushar-kharbanda72

@kotwanikunal
Copy link
Member

@tushar-kharbanda72 Can you please address the comments?

@kartg
Copy link
Member

kartg commented Aug 3, 2022

@tushar-kharbanda72 are you still aiming to have this backported to 2.x ?

@andrross
Copy link
Member

andrross commented Feb 2, 2023

Closing this...original PR #2639 was reverted in #3046, reimplemented in #3982, and that was backported in #4087

@andrross andrross closed this Feb 2, 2023
@andrross andrross deleted the backport/backport-2639-to-2.x branch February 2, 2023 21:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants