Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix test failures in #5177 #5194

Closed

Conversation

AMoo-Miki
Copy link
Collaborator

Re #5177

Check List

  • All tests pass
    • yarn test:jest
    • yarn test:jest_integration
    • yarn test:ftr
  • New functionality includes testing.
  • New functionality has been documented.
  • Update CHANGELOG.md
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

@AMoo-Miki AMoo-Miki added the Skip-Changelog PRs that are too trivial to warrant a changelog or release notes entry label Oct 4, 2023
@ashwin-pc
Copy link
Member

I'm looking at the last test run for #5177 and no test failed there. Also savedSearch is declared twice yes, but can you remove the other declaration of it instead of this one? A fix anan made will have a conflict here otherwise.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 4, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #5194 (baa9fbe) into 2.x (ab84ea1) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              2.x    #5194   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   66.80%   66.80%           
=======================================
  Files        3278     3278           
  Lines       63042    63042           
  Branches    10028    10028           
=======================================
  Hits        42116    42116           
+ Misses      18541    18461   -80     
- Partials     2385     2465   +80     
Flag Coverage Δ
Linux_1 35.32% <ø> (ø)
Linux_2 55.26% <ø> (ø)
Linux_3 43.76% <ø> (ø)
Linux_4 35.55% <ø> (ø)
Windows_1 35.33% <ø> (ø)
Windows_2 55.23% <ø> (ø)
Windows_3 43.76% <ø> (ø)
Windows_4 35.55% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 19 files with indirect coverage changes

@kavilla
Copy link
Member

kavilla commented Oct 4, 2023

I'm looking at the last test run for #5177 and no test failed there. Also savedSearch is declared twice yes, but can you remove the other declaration of it instead of this one? A fix anan made will have a conflict here otherwise.

i think the fix might have gotten merged prior to the deangular.

Copy link
Member

@kavilla kavilla left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do the other changes from the original PR have no impact?

@AMoo-Miki AMoo-Miki closed this Oct 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Skip-Changelog PRs that are too trivial to warrant a changelog or release notes entry v2.11.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants