Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added generic maintainers and admins responsibilities. #11

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 10, 2021

Conversation

dblock
Copy link
Member

@dblock dblock commented Jun 2, 2021

Signed-off-by: dblock [email protected]

Description

Added generic maintainers responsibilities, inspired by opensearch-project/OpenSearch#800.

Check List

  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

@dblock dblock requested a review from hyandell June 2, 2021 14:29
@dblock
Copy link
Member Author

dblock commented Jun 2, 2021

@CEHENKLE care to take a look?

@dblock dblock force-pushed the maintainers branch 5 times, most recently from 0ea27d2 to f45ebe6 Compare June 2, 2021 14:43
@dblock dblock changed the title Added generic maintainers responsibilities. Added generic maintainers and admins responsibilities. Jun 2, 2021
MAINTAINERS.md Outdated
Prioritize security above-all. For example, maintainer's Github keys must be password protected securely and any reported security vulnerabilities are addressed before features or bugs.
### Prioritize Security

Prioritize security above-all, including your own. Maintainer's Github keys must be password protected securely and any reported security vulnerabilities are addressed before features or bugs.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Prioritize security above-all, including your own.

That reads a little oddly. It makes it sound like you want maintainers to risk life and limb, which is not, I think, our intention :)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:)

Changing to "security is your number one priority" to take from the AWS playbook.

@@ -27,16 +29,25 @@ Review pull requests regularly, comment, suggest, reject, merge and close. Accep

### Triage Open Issues

Review issues regularly and triage by labelling issues. For example, add "help wanted" to good issues for new community members. Request for more information from a submitter if an issue is not clear. Create new labels as needed by the project.
Manage labels, review issues regularly, and triage by labelling them. For example, add "help wanted" to good issues for new community members and *blocker* for issues that scare you or need immediate attention. Request for more information from a submitter if an issue is not clear. Create new labels as needed by the project.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You've pulled out some of the specifics of what our labels currently are. Considering we're iterating on them, that might be smart (I'd hate to roll this out to 25+ repos and decide we wanted to change from "minor" to "trivial" or something like that..

What do you think of a putting out a separate doc with label information into .github?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's a good idea. I think I'd like to leave this text as is for now as it says "For example, .." but as we try to standardize labels we can extract.


### Maintain Overall Health of the Repo

Keep the main branch at production quality at all times.
Keep the `main` branch at production quality at all times. Backport features as needed. Cut release branches and tags to enable future patches.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You've cut out the "how" here of how we want to do this. I think it's important that we don't assume people know what the tags should be or what the branches should be.

So similar comment to above -- should the "hows" be in separate documents that live in github? I had rolled the what you do and how you do it together in my maintainer doc. But I'm not religious about keeping it that way, as long both are covered somewhere.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can't possibly spell the detailed how's in the template repository because YMMV across repos. How about accepting this as a start or suggest what additional text will bring it to par with minimum expectations?


### Use Semver

Use and enforce [semantic versioning](https://semver.org/) and do not let breaking changes be made outside of major releases.

### Release Frequently

Make frequent project releases to the community.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Again -- how? I think we need to write down how you release and when we plan to do it.

Copy link
Member Author

@dblock dblock Jun 10, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should say "see releasing", but since it doesn't exist we can't spell it out now and I don't want to boil the ocean.

| Henri Yandell | [hyandell](https://github.com/hyandell) | Amazon |
| Admin | GitHub ID | Affiliation |
| --------------- | --------------------------------------- | ----------- |
| Henri Yandell | [hyandell](https://github.com/hyandell) | Amazon |

## Admin Responsibilities
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like this whole doc :)

@dblock
Copy link
Member Author

dblock commented Jun 10, 2021

@CEHENKLE I pushed a change for the security sentences.

Can you please suggest any deltas between this and what you'd be OK merging?

@dblock
Copy link
Member Author

dblock commented Jun 10, 2021

For HowTo's we're doing #14

Copy link
Member

@CEHENKLE CEHENKLE left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With #14 open, I am down like a clown :)

@dblock dblock merged commit a407b2b into opensearch-project:main Jun 10, 2021
@dblock dblock deleted the maintainers branch June 11, 2021 19:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants