Find Refaster style recipes as well #4693
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@justine-gehring Let me know if this would be helpful, and then we can do Yaml recipes next. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What's changed?
Find Refaster style recipes as well; through proxy of
@RecipeDescriptor.What's your motivation?
Be able to analyze the recipes we have, and potentially train on those found.
Anything in particular you'd like reviewers to focus on?
Added a new
RecipeType.Refaster; figured that be easier than an@Option.Have you considered any alternatives or workarounds?
@AfterTemplate; would then also match those from Picnic, but those lack a guaranteed name & description, making them harder to train on.Any additional context