doc: add notes for 2020-01-14

Closes: #54

meeting-notes/2020.01.14_meeting_notes.md

@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+# OpenJS Foundation Standards Team Meeting 2020-01-14
+
+## Links
+
+* **Recording**: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Zo9NmvgOms
+* **GitHub Issue**: https://github.com/openjs-foundation/standards/issues/54
+
+## Present
+
+* Jory Burson (@jorydotcom)
+* Brian Kardell (@bkardell)
+* Myles Borins (@MylesBorins)
+* Jordan Harband (@LJHarb)
+* Sendil Kumar (@sendilkumarn)
+* Richard
+* Mike Samuel
+
+
+## Agenda
+
+### Announcements
+
+*Extracted from **cross-project-council-agenda** labeled issues and pull requests from the **openjs-foundation org** prior to the meeting.
+
+* Brian: shares that the results from the TAG are in. David, Kenneth, Rossen were elected.
+
+### openjs-foundation/standards
+
+* Audit membership list [#53](https://github.com/openjs-foundation/standards/issues/53)
+
+Suggested cleanup of existing membership list. 14 members on the team. Culled from the list after 14 days. Myles to close issue and Jory to follow up with the 2-3 list members who haven’t been participating.
+
+* Joining the Unicode Consortium 
+[#43](https://github.com/openjs-foundation/standards/issues/43)
+
+* Eemeli isn’t present; will table discussion until they are present 
+* There is a cost related to membership - it would be reasonable for the proposal to find out which level we would want to join. 
+
+* OSI Affiliate Membership [#32](https://github.com/openjs-foundation/standards/issues/32)
+
+* We brought this up at the CPC meeting; it was well received. 
+* Ref: https://opensource.org/affiliates; https://opensource.org/affiliates/about
+* we would want to be Affiliate members; it is a non-profit membership. We have to apply and meet the qualifications. 
+  * “Make annual contributions where possible” but there is no direct expectation for fees
+* we would be able to nominate / vote for affiliate director. 
+* Time sensitivity due to upcoming elections
+* Group generally agrees; the idea would be that this membership would be managed through the standards wg. Foundation could execute paperwork on behalf of the group.
+* Next step: Board approval
+
+* TC-53 Participation [#24](https://github.com/openjs-foundation/standards/issues/24)
+
+* Still waiting to hear back from Robin and Brian; Jory to bump again and add Donovan & Myles
+* Upcoming meetings related to TC53: teleconference on 1/15 and in person meeting at the end of Feb. in TX
+
+* Standards-related Travel Budget Clarification [#6](https://github.com/openjs-foundation/standards/issues/6)
+
+* We have a $60k budget for the foundation this year, we used $30k last year. 
+* Standards travel could eat in to that.
+* In general we would expect companies who are members of the foundation and are sending people on behalf of their organizations to pay for their people
+
+* On-boarding process PR [#50](https://github.com/openjs-foundation/standards/pull/50)
+
+* MV process
+
+
+## Q&A, Other
+
+* Calendar? Let’s give it a try.
+* Note taking is a great way to get started in a standards group.
+
+## Upcoming Meetings
+
+* **Calendar**: https://calendar.openjsf.org
+
+Click `+GoogleCalendar` at the bottom right to add to your own Google calendar.
+
+