[PRE REVIEW]: GeneralizIT: A Python Solution for Generalizability Theory Computations

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @tylerjsmith111 (Tyler Smith)
Repository: https://github.com/tylerjsmith111/GeneralizIT
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v0.0.1
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Chris Vernon

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f5eab2c27c2c1ee978dd4d5d94c7ed4d"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f5eab2c27c2c1ee978dd4d5d94c7ed4d/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f5eab2c27c2c1ee978dd4d5d94c7ed4d/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f5eab2c27c2c1ee978dd4d5d94c7ed4d)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @tylerjsmith111. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@tylerjsmith111 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.03 s (535.9 files/s, 144235.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          10            599           1207           1323
Markdown                         2            109              0            383
TeX                              1              8              0            111
YAML                             1              1              4             23
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            14            717           1211           1840
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    10	Tyler Smith

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 2403

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1007/978-1-4757-3456-0 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1745-3992.1992.tb00260.x is OK
- 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.11.008 is OK
- 10.1080/08957347.2011.532417 is OK
- 10.32614/CRAN.package.gtheory is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: G-String-MV

❌ MISSING DOIs

- 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1976.tb00003.x may be a valid DOI for title: The symmetry of generalizability theory: Applicati...
- 10.3109/0142159x.2012.703791 may be a valid DOI for title: Generalizability theory for the perplexed: a pract...
- 10.12738/estp.2015.3.2278 may be a valid DOI for title: Comparing the Effectiveness of SPSS and EduG Using...

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[crvernon]

👋 @tylerjsmith111 - thanks for your submission to JOSS. While I am finding you a topic editor, please reduce the length of your paper to right at or under 1000 words. Thanks.

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

GridTest: testing and metrics collection for Python
Submitting author: @vsoch
Handling editor: @usethedata (Retired)
Reviewers: @cbrueffer, @khinsen
Similarity score: 0.6165

simChef: High-quality data science simulations in R
Submitting author: @jpdunc23
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @rcannood, @Abinashbunty
Similarity score: 0.6146

cmstatr: An R Package for Statistical Analysis of Composite Material
Data
Submitting author: @kloppen
Handling editor: @usethedata (Retired)
Reviewers: @myousefi2016, @JonasMoss
Similarity score: 0.6117

measr: Bayesian psychometric measurement using Stan
Submitting author: @wjakethompson
Handling editor: @chartgerink (Retired)
Reviewers: @smasongarrison, @Wenchao-Ma, @seandamiandevine
Similarity score: 0.6085

Visualizations with statistical details: The ggstatsplot approach
Submitting author: @IndrajeetPatil
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @njtierney, @kevinrue
Similarity score: 0.6070

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[crvernon]

@editorialbot reject

Actually, after looking at this, it seems you only have a few day commit history. Generally in JOSS, we require a longer development history (see our substantial scholarly effort requirements). This is also lacking standard community packaging so that someone could install it as a Python package with its dependencies.

My suggestion at this point would be to revisit the JOSS requirements, modify your submission to account for those, and resubmit when ready.

On these grounds, I am going to reject this for now but feel free to resubmit after the package meets JOSS criteria. Thank you!

[editorialbot]

Paper rejected.

[tylerjsmith111]

Hi Chris, I appreciate the timely response. Would you mind clarifying the point about standard community packaging? GeneralizIT is available to be installed via pypi (see Usage) with all required dependencies for this project available in our GitHub repository. What else needs to be present or restructured to fit the guidelines for our resubmission? Thanks, Tyler

…

________________________________ From: Chris Vernon ***@***.***> Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2024 8:17:59 AM To: openjournals/joss-reviews ***@***.***> Cc: Tyler James Smith ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: GeneralizIT: A Python Solution for Generalizability Theory Computations (Issue #7537) @editorialbot<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/editorialbot__;!!Dq0X2DkFhyF93HkjWTBQKhk!WrKp8JRsL9Y2dl8pRPBO_tLc6WrikZvXReERdyxsq92HQBHVREup4zOlJBfcQT0uZ4lRa_XtAgU8CKBDjB0YbGFoduXBUDddKgY$> reject Actually, after looking at this, it seems you only have a few day commit history. Generally in JOSS, we require a longer development history (see our substantial scholarly effort requirements<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html*substantial-scholarly-effort__;Iw!!Dq0X2DkFhyF93HkjWTBQKhk!WrKp8JRsL9Y2dl8pRPBO_tLc6WrikZvXReERdyxsq92HQBHVREup4zOlJBfcQT0uZ4lRa_XtAgU8CKBDjB0YbGFoduXBazyjzSQ$>). This is also lacking standard community packaging so that someone could install it as a Python package with its dependencies. My suggestion at this point would be to revisit the JOSS requirements, modify your submission to account for those, and resubmit when ready. On these grounds, I am going to reject this for now but feel free to resubmit after the package meets JOSS criteria. Thank you! — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/7537*issuecomment-2506229156__;Iw!!Dq0X2DkFhyF93HkjWTBQKhk!WrKp8JRsL9Y2dl8pRPBO_tLc6WrikZvXReERdyxsq92HQBHVREup4zOlJBfcQT0uZ4lRa_XtAgU8CKBDjB0YbGFoduXBwl-bu9c$>, or unsubscribe<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AX4GQK7XUHKOAGZUQDDQDYT2C4QZPAVCNFSM6AAAAABSVG7JYSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDKMBWGIZDSMJVGY__;!!Dq0X2DkFhyF93HkjWTBQKhk!WrKp8JRsL9Y2dl8pRPBO_tLc6WrikZvXReERdyxsq92HQBHVREup4zOlJBfcQT0uZ4lRa_XtAgU8CKBDjB0YbGFoduXBefizEqU$>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>