[PRE REVIEW]: ASTE: An artificial solver testing environment for partitioned coupling with preCICE

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @davidscn (David Schneider)
Repository: https://github.com/precice/aste
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper
Version: v3.2.0
Editor: @diehlpk
Reviewers: @asalmgren, @hverhelst
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/461395f81bcedd77828c4b44f53b7179"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/461395f81bcedd77828c4b44f53b7179/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/461395f81bcedd77828c4b44f53b7179/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/461395f81bcedd77828c4b44f53b7179)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @davidscn. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@davidscn if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.11 s (933.2 files/s, 325065.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C/C++ Header                     8           3248           4216          17733
Python                          14            421            163           2512
JSON                             8              1              0           2086
C++                             15            266            109           1608
XML                             28            157             36           1583
Markdown                         4            122              0            359
YAML                             8              6             13            324
CMake                            2             40             64            150
TeX                              1             12              0            121
Bourne Shell                    13             41             30            100
make                             1              3              0              6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           102           4317           4631          26582
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   125	David Schneider
   117	Frédéric Simonis
   109	Florian Lindner
    67	Kursat Yurt
    56	Kürşat Yurt
    18	--global
    18	Frederic Simonis
     8	David Sommer
     7	Gerasimos Chourdakis
     6	Kursat_Yurt
     6	S0mmerD
     5	Kyle Davis
     4	Benjamin Uekermann
     4	Kursat
     4	dependabot[bot]
     3	Boris Martin
     1	Guillaume De Nayer
     1	Klaudius Scheufele
     1	timo-schrader
     1	uekerman

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.12688/openreseurope.14445.2 is OK
- 10.3390/a14060166 is OK
- 10.18419/darus-4167 is OK
- 10.18419/opus-10581 is OK
- 10.1002/nme.2579 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.23967/c.coupled.2023.016 may be a valid DOI for title: Data-parallel radial-basis-function interpolation ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Robust and Efficient Barycentric Cell-Interpolatio...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Second-order projection-based mapping methods for ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Visualization Toolkit (4th ed.)
- 10.1007/978-3-030-47956-5_10 may be a valid DOI for title: ExaFSA: Parallel Fluid-Structure-Acoustic Simulati...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: MeTis: Unstructured Graph Partitioning and Sparse ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: JSON for Modern C++

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1133

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Micro Manager: a Python package for adaptive and flexible two-scale coupling
Submitting author: @IshaanDesai
Handling editor: @philipcardiff (Active)
Reviewers: @mayrmt, @mrogowski, @mbkumar
Similarity score: 0.7310

Akantu: an HPC finite-element library for contact and dynamic fracture simulations
Submitting author: @nrichart
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @vijaysm, @chennachaos
Similarity score: 0.7185

DMStag: Staggered, Structured Grids for PETSc
Submitting author: @psanan
Handling editor: @kyleniemeyer (Active)
Reviewers: @elauksap, @mbarzegary
Similarity score: 0.7119

ogs6py and VTUinterface: streamlining OpenGeoSys workflows in Python
Submitting author: @joergbuchwald
Handling editor: @leouieda (Retired)
Reviewers: @cpgr, @TobbeTripitaka, @akaszynski
Similarity score: 0.7108

AMReX: a framework for block-structured adaptive mesh refinement
Submitting author: @asalmgren
Handling editor: @kyleniemeyer (Active)
Reviewers: @MatthewTurk, @RemiLehe, @cmsquared
Similarity score: 0.7070

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[danielskatz]

@davidscn - thanks for your submission. While I look for an editor, you could work on the possibly missing DOIs that editorialbot suggests, but note that some may be incorrect. Please feel free to make changes to your .bib file, then use the command @editorialbot check references to check again, and the command @editorialbot generate pdf when the references are right to make a new PDF. editorialbot commands need to be the first entry in a new comment.

[danielskatz]

👋 @diehlpk - would you be willing to edit this submission?

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot invite @diehlpk as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[diehlpk]

@danielskatz yes, I can do it but only can start in the second week of August.

[diehlpk]

@editorialbot add @diehlpk as reviewer

[editorialbot]

Can't add reviewers: There is no editor assigned yet

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot add @diehlpk as editor

Thanks!

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @diehlpk is now the editor

[davidscn]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.12688/openreseurope.14445.2 is OK
- 10.3390/a14060166 is OK
- 10.18419/darus-4167 is OK
- 10.23967/c.coupled.2023.016 is OK
- 10.18419/opus-12128 is OK
- 10.18419/opus-10581 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-47956-5_10 is OK
- 10.1002/nme.2579 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Robust and Efficient Barycentric Cell-Interpolatio...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Visualization Toolkit (4th ed.)
- No DOI given, and none found for title: MeTis: Unstructured Graph Partitioning and Sparse ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: JSON for Modern C++

INVALID DOIs

- None

[davidscn]

@editorialbot generate pdf

I added now missing DOIs where possible. For the remaining entries, there are at most URLs given and no DOIs available. If that's a problem, I would consider to embed the mentioned URL into the plain text rather than making it a full citation.

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[diehlpk]

@IshaanDesai do you have time to review this paper?

[diehlpk]

Hi @psanan do you have time to review this paper?

[diehlpk]

Hi @asalmgren do you have time to review this paper?

[IshaanDesai]

@diehlpk I work in the same research group as the authors of this paper. If this is a conflict of interest, then I am not a good fit here. If this is not an issue, I am happy to be a reviewer.

[diehlpk]

@IshaanDesai that would be COI. Would you mind suggestion other reviewers?

[diehlpk]

@davidscn could you please recommend some potential reviewers?

[asalmgren]

Realistically I couldn't get to it until October.

…

On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 9:12 AM Patrick Diehl ***@***.***> wrote: Hi @asalmgren <https://github.com/asalmgren> do you have time to review this paper? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#7064 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACRE6YVU2MP7MBII5YSX6H3ZQTS5PAVCNFSM6AAAAABL22Y3HOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDENZYGI4TEOBVHA> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

-- Ann Almgren Senior Scientist; Dept. Head, Applied Mathematics Pronouns: she/her/hers

[diehlpk]

@asalmgren That would not be any problem.

[diehlpk]

@editorialbot add @asalmgren as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@asalmgren added to the reviewers list!

[davidscn]

@davidscn could you please recommend some potential reviewers?

Not entirely sure about the prerequisites to be a reviewer. Of course, we could suggest again the reviewers from #5842, as they are somewhat familiar with the preCICE-verse and JOSS. Other than that I could maybe suggest @hverhelst or @antRthorn. Would that comply with the JOSS formalities?

[diehlpk]

HI @hverhelst do you have time to review this paper?

[diehlpk]

Hi @antRthorn do you have time to review this paper?

[diehlpk]

Hi @IshaanDesai do you have time to review this paper?

[hverhelst]

Hi @diehlpk, thanks for the invite! I have time from the first week of September onwards, is that OK?

[IshaanDesai]

Hi @IshaanDesai do you have time to review this paper?

Due to the clear conflict of interest that we previously discussed, I have to decline here.

[diehlpk]

@editorialbot add @hverhelst as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@hverhelst added to the reviewers list!

[diehlpk]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #7127.