Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: BGmisc: An R Package for Extended Behavior Genetics Analysis #5894

Closed
editorialbot opened this issue Sep 28, 2023 · 30 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
HTML pre-review R TeX Track: 4 (SBCS) Social, Behavioral, and Cognitive Sciences

Comments

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator

editorialbot commented Sep 28, 2023

Submitting author: @smasongarrison (S. Mason Garrison)
Repository: https://github.com/R-Computing-Lab/BGmisc/
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0
Editor: @osorensen
Reviewers: @wjakethompson, @mhu48
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ee3a025be4f61584f977a7657d936187"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ee3a025be4f61584f977a7657d936187/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ee3a025be4f61584f977a7657d936187/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ee3a025be4f61584f977a7657d936187)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @smasongarrison. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@smasongarrison if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot editorialbot added pre-review Track: 5 (DSAIS) Data Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Machine Learning labels Sep 28, 2023
@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.03 s (1059.9 files/s, 166165.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                             4            140              8           1794
R                               17            105            587            916
Markdown                         5            165              0            625
XML                              1              0              2            441
TeX                              1              9              0            201
Rmd                              6            165            289            114
YAML                             2              9              4             70
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            36            593            890           4161
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Wordcount for paper.md is 1203

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1086/279872 is OK
- 10.1159/000363105 is OK
- 10.1080/10705511.2018.1493385 is OK
- 10/f8rfrg is OK
- 10.1007/s10519-021-10055-x is OK
- 10.1007/s10519-020-10037-5 is OK
- 10/ff3dbm is OK
- 10.1007/s10519-008-9225-0 is OK
- 10.1007/978-0-387-21750-5_5 is OK
- 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1984.tb00802.x is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

bmgarch: An R-Package for Bayesian Multivariate GARCH models
Submitting author: @ph-rast
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @ChristopherLucas, @mwt
Similarity score: 0.8321

rTASSEL: An R interface to TASSEL for analyzing genomic diversity
Submitting author: @btmonier
Handling editor: @fboehm (Active)
Reviewers: @tkchafin, @tomsing1
Similarity score: 0.8271

genieR: An R package for inference of demographic history of phylogenies
Submitting author: @xiangfstats
Handling editor: @pjotrp (Retired)
Reviewers: @pboesu
Similarity score: 0.8246

GeneNetwork: framework for web-based genetics
Submitting author: @pjotrp
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @krother, @agarie
Similarity score: 0.8157

fitODBOD: An R Package to Model Binomial Outcome Data using Binomial Mixture and Alternate Binomial Distributions.
Submitting author: @Amalan-ConStat
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @osorensen, @jjharden
Similarity score: 0.8087

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Sep 28, 2023

@editorialbot query scope

@smasongarrison – this submission is one the smaller side of what we'd typically publish here so I'm going to start a scope query with the broader editorial team. This will take a couple of weeks to complete.

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Submission flagged for editorial review.

@editorialbot editorialbot added the query-scope Submissions of uncertain scope for JOSS label Sep 28, 2023
@smasongarrison
Copy link

smasongarrison commented Sep 28, 2023

@editorialbot query scope

@smasongarrison – this submission is one the smaller side of what we'd typically publish here so I'm going to start a scope query with the broader editorial team. This will take a couple of weeks to complete.

Could you expand upon this some more? Because I'm not sure, I'm understanding what you mean by small in scope.

Nevermind, I misread what you wrote.

@editorialbot editorialbot added Track: 4 (SBCS) Social, Behavioral, and Cognitive Sciences and removed Track: 5 (DSAIS) Data Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Machine Learning labels Nov 28, 2023
@oliviaguest
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@oliviaguest
Copy link
Member

@smasongarrison I am really sorry things are so slow-moving. I will try and focus on speeding this up, but at the moment I am struggling to find an editor with the appropriate expertise. If nobody is found soon, I will take this over myself.

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

bmgarch: An R-Package for Bayesian Multivariate GARCH models
Submitting author: @ph-rast
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @ChristopherLucas, @mwt
Similarity score: 0.8409

rTASSEL: An R interface to TASSEL for analyzing genomic diversity
Submitting author: @btmonier
Handling editor: @fboehm (Active)
Reviewers: @tkchafin, @tomsing1
Similarity score: 0.8323

genieR: An R package for inference of demographic history of phylogenies
Submitting author: @xiangfstats
Handling editor: @pjotrp (Retired)
Reviewers: @pboesu
Similarity score: 0.8306

GeneNetwork: framework for web-based genetics
Submitting author: @pjotrp
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @krother, @agarie
Similarity score: 0.8236

rigr: Regression, Inference, and General Data Analysis Tools in R
Submitting author: @yiqunchen
Handling editor: @osorensen (Active)
Reviewers: @stefanocoretta, @tomsing1
Similarity score: 0.8145

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

@oliviaguest
Copy link
Member

@fboehm @osorensen @jbytecode is anybody experienced and available to take this one? 😌

@osorensen
Copy link
Member

Sure!

@osorensen
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot add @osorensen as editor

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Assigned! @osorensen is now the editor

@osorensen osorensen removed the query-scope Submissions of uncertain scope for JOSS label Jan 7, 2024
@osorensen
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

bmgarch: An R-Package for Bayesian Multivariate GARCH models
Submitting author: @ph-rast
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @ChristopherLucas, @mwt
Similarity score: 0.8415

genieR: An R package for inference of demographic history of phylogenies
Submitting author: @xiangfstats
Handling editor: @pjotrp (Retired)
Reviewers: @pboesu
Similarity score: 0.8325

rTASSEL: An R interface to TASSEL for analyzing genomic diversity
Submitting author: @btmonier
Handling editor: @fboehm (Active)
Reviewers: @tkchafin, @tomsing1
Similarity score: 0.8309

GeneNetwork: framework for web-based genetics
Submitting author: @pjotrp
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @krother, @agarie
Similarity score: 0.8264

rigr: Regression, Inference, and General Data Analysis Tools in R
Submitting author: @yiqunchen
Handling editor: @osorensen (Active)
Reviewers: @stefanocoretta, @tomsing1
Similarity score: 0.8156

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

@osorensen
Copy link
Member

👋 @mhu48, @vankesteren, @wjakethompson, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

@wjakethompson
Copy link

I don't have any experience with behavior genetics, so I'm would not be able to give feedback on the accuracy/quality of the methods. I could review for R package best practices (e.g., test coverage, documentation, etc.) if that would be helpful.

@mhu48
Copy link

mhu48 commented Jan 10, 2024 via email

@osorensen
Copy link
Member

osorensen commented Jan 10, 2024

I don't have any experience with behavior genetics, so I'm would not be able to give feedback on the accuracy/quality of the methods. I could review for R package best practices (e.g., test coverage, documentation, etc.) if that would be helpful.

Thanks @wjakethompson, that would be really helpful. The R package best practices are also the main aspects of a JOSS review, so I'll add you as a reviewer.

@osorensen
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot add @wjakethompson as reviewer

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@wjakethompson added to the reviewers list!

@osorensen
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot add @mhu48 as reviewer

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@mhu48 added to the reviewers list!

@osorensen
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot start review

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

OK, I've started the review over in #6203.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
HTML pre-review R TeX Track: 4 (SBCS) Social, Behavioral, and Cognitive Sciences
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants