[PRE REVIEW]: StormR: An R package to quantify and map the tropical storms and cyclones’ winds characteristics

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @thomasarsouze (Thomas Arsouze)
Repository: https://github.com/umr-amap/StormR
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v0.1.0
Editor: @hugoledoux
Reviewers: @gsapijaszko, @highamm
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/774028082ef61ffc3474118bf96fef84"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/774028082ef61ffc3474118bf96fef84/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/774028082ef61ffc3474118bf96fef84/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/774028082ef61ffc3474118bf96fef84)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @thomasarsouze. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@thomasarsouze if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1579/0044-7447(2008)37[241:TVOCWF]2.0.CO;2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41467-019-09319-2 is OK
- 10.1016/j.rsma.2022.102207 is OK
- 10.1038/s41467-021-21777-1 is OK
- 10.1017/9781009157896.002 is OK
- 10.1073/pnas.1922500117 is OK
- 10.1175/2009BAMS2755.1 is OK
- 10.1175/MWR3106.1 is OK
- 10.1002/j.1477-8696.1999.tb06435.x is OK
- 10.1038/nature03906 is OK
- 10.1080/00431672.1974.9931702 is OK
- 10.1890/02-4057 is OK
- 10.1890/0012-9615(2001)071[0027:LARIOH]2.0.CO;2 is OK
- 10.1175/MWR2831.1 is OK
- 10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108<1212:AAMOTW>2.0.CO;2 is OK
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<4501:NMIOBV>2.0.CO;2 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1080/00431672.1974.9931702 may be a valid DOI for title: The Hurricane Disaster—Potential Scale

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.25921/82ty-9e16 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.17 s (221.1 files/s, 59701.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               18           1101           1990           4592
Markdown                         4            145              0            675
TeX                              1             26              0            350
YAML                             8             52             12            314
JSON                             1              0              0            117
Rmd                              6            170            642             74
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            38           1494           2644           6122
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1147

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[kthyng]

Hi @thomasarsouze and thanks for your submission. Unfortunately our editors are all fully loaded at the moment so I will add this to the waitlist. In the meantime please check out the list of reviewers above and suggest 5 reviewers to help the future editor get started. Also check out the DOI notes above. Thanks for your patience!

[kthyng]

@hugoledoux could you edit this submission?

[kthyng]

@editorialbot invite @hugoledoux as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[hugoledoux]

@editorialbot assign @hugoledoux as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @hugoledoux is now the editor

[hugoledoux]

@kthyng @thomasarsouze I am taking 3weeks off starting from 20 August so that might be a bit slow (and mountain biking in the middle of nowhere so no computer...), but I'll hope to find reviewers before I leave.

But be aware that this might be a bit slower than "normal".

[thomaspibanez]

Hi @hugoledoux,

Thanks for accepting handling our manuscript. I'm not sure where we are supposed to suggest reviewers. I check the list of reviewers. I don't know any of them, but based on the short description, Evaristo Rojas-Mayoral, Matt Higham, yongzesong, molgor, or Hamza Ahsan could do the job. Outside this list Aaron Hogan ([email protected]), Bob Muscarella ([email protected]) that both have GitHub profiles would be also good reviewers as they are users of such software.

Best wishes,

Thomas

[thomaspibanez]

Hi @kthyng @hugoledoux

I checked out and fixed the DOI notes.

Best wishes,

Thomas

[hugoledoux]

@thomasarsouze while I am looking for reviewers, I noticed that 4 people contributed to the code on github, but there are 6 authors... JOSS deals with this differently from "traditional" journals, we don't consider the person funding the project as possible authors. See our rules there: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html?highlight=authorship#authorship

Of course maybe those people contributed, but if you could write here what they did that would help us move further.

[thomaspibanez]

@hugoledoux Swen Jullien and Christophe Menkes (listed here : https://umr-amap.github.io/StormR/) are two climatologists working on tropical cyclones. They participated to regular meeting regarding the development of the package, helped with cyclone models selection, and with the writing of the documentation. They didn't work on the project with GitHub that why they are not in the contributor list but their contribution was essential.

[hugoledoux]

okay, that's fine. Thanks for the prompt and clear answer!

[hugoledoux]

@editorialbot add @gsapijaszko as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@gsapijaszko added to the reviewers list!

[hugoledoux]

@editorialbot add @highamm as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@highamm added to the reviewers list!

[hugoledoux]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #5766.