[PRE REVIEW]: elmada: Dynamic electricity carbon emission factors and prices for Europe

[whedon]

Submitting author: @mfleschutz (Markus Fleschutz)
Repository: https://github.com/DrafProject/elmada
Version: v0.0.6
Editor: @fraukewiese
Reviewers: @nmstreethran, @olejandro
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/9a6bf04b8a7bbc6b29b2ad79103acf42"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/9a6bf04b8a7bbc6b29b2ad79103acf42/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/9a6bf04b8a7bbc6b29b2ad79103acf42/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/9a6bf04b8a7bbc6b29b2ad79103acf42)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mfleschutz. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@mfleschutz if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper

[whedon]

Wordcount for paper.md is 480

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117040 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.5126771 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.14 s (376.5 files/s, 94902.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SVG                              5              0             33           7892
Python                          33            920            423           2827
Markdown                         5            190              0            523
YAML                             4              9              4            120
HTML                             1              7              0             51
TeX                              1              5              0             45
JSON                             1              0              0             28
TOML                             1              1              1             18
INI                              1              0              2             10
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            52           1132            463          11514
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '9ec23e61ec74125d60b5b612' was
gathered on 2021/07/23.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
flma0001                        46          6772           2602          100.00

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
flma0001                   4170           61.6          0.9                7.22

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[danielskatz]

👋 @fraukewiese - would you be able to edit this submission?

[danielskatz]

@whedon invite @fraukewiese as editor

[whedon]

@fraukewiese has been invited to edit this submission.

[arfon]

👋 @fraukewiese - would you be able to edit this submission?

Just an FYI that @fraukewiese is OoO until 3 August so might be a little slow to respond here :-)

[danielskatz]

I think this is still the best option for this submission.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@whedon invite @fraukewiese as editor

[whedon]

@fraukewiese has been invited to edit this submission.

[fraukewiese]

Yes I can edit this paper.

[fraukewiese]

@whedon assign me as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @fraukewiese

[fraukewiese]

@milicag , @ckaldemeyer , @nmstreethran – would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

The submission under review here is elmada: Dynamic electricity carbon emission factors and prices for Europe

[nmstreethran]

@fraukewiese Yes, I'd be happy to review this submission.

[fraukewiese]

Great! Thanks @nmstreethran
I will add you as a reviewer now but won't actually start the review until we have a second reviewer signed up.

[fraukewiese]

@whedon add @nmstreethran as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @nmstreethran is now a reviewer

[fraukewiese]

@milicag , @ckaldemeyer – would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

The submission under review here is elmada: Dynamic electricity carbon emission factors and prices for Europe

[fraukewiese]

For information: I am contacting milicag and ckaldemeyer now per Mail to find out whether they could review, if not I will ask other reviewer.

[fraukewiese]

ckaldemeyer cannot review this (answer by Mail) and I do not receive an answer from milicag (also by Mail), so I will ask other potential reviewer now.

[fraukewiese]

@olejandro : would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

The submission under review here is elmada: Dynamic electricity carbon emission factors and prices for Europe

[olejandro]

@fraukewiese Yes, I'd be happy to. What's the timeframe?

[fraukewiese]

Great, thanks @olejandro !
We aim for the review process to be completed within about 4-6 weeks but it is necessary to make a start well ahead of this as JOSS reviews are by their nature iterative and any early feedback you may be able to provide to the author will be very helpful in meeting this schedule.

[fraukewiese]

@whedon add @olejandro as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @olejandro is now a reviewer

[fraukewiese]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #3625.

[fraukewiese]

@olejandro , @nmstreethran – thanks a lot for agreeing to review here! See you over in #3625 where the actual review will take place.