[PRE REVIEW]: grapesAgri1-Collection of shiny applications for data analysis in Agriculture-Part 1

[whedon]

Submitting author: @pratheesh3780 (Pratheesh P Gopinath)
Repository: https://github.com/pratheesh3780/grapesAgri1
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @fabian-s
Reviewers: @adithirgis, @elimillera
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7d63999d1569093e17dbdbfb3a5f5247"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7d63999d1569093e17dbdbfb3a5f5247/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7d63999d1569093e17dbdbfb3a5f5247/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7d63999d1569093e17dbdbfb3a5f5247)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @pratheesh3780. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

The author's suggestion for the handling editor is @KristinaRiemer.

@pratheesh3780 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.04 s (501.5 files/s, 156639.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               12            461            487           4298
Rmd                              6            113            100           1031
TeX                              1             23              0            181
Markdown                         3             52              0            125
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            22            649            587           5635
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '3359859ebf9fd8add314dfb2' was
gathered on 2021/06/11.
No commited files with the specified extensions were found.

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1093/oso/9780190222055.003.0002 may be a valid DOI for title: Exploratory Data Analysis

INVALID DOIs

- None

[kthyng]

Hi @pratheesh3780 and thanks for your submission. We currently have a backlog of submissions that I am adding this to. It will be handled as soon as an editor with relevant expertise is available. Thanks for your patience.

[arfon]

@whedon invite @fabian-s as editor

👋 @fabian-s – I realize this is somewhat outside your field, but we don't really have an 'ideal' editor for this submission 😅 . As such, would you be willing to edit this for us?

[whedon]

@fabian-s has been invited to edit this submission.

[fabian-s]

@whedon assign me as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @fabian-s

[fabian-s]

@dlebauer @elimillera @adithirgis --

would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

Thank you for considering this!

[adithirgis]

Hi @fabian-s,

Thanks for inviting, I can review this submission.

[fabian-s]

@whedon add @adithirgis as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @adithirgis is now a reviewer

[elimillera]

Hello @fabian-s ,

I am able to review. Thanks!

[fabian-s]

@whedon add @elimillera as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @elimillera is now a reviewer

[fabian-s]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #3437.