[PRE REVIEW]: FAT Forensics: A Python Toolbox for Implementing and Deploying Fairness, Accountability and Transparency Algorithms in Predictive Systems

[whedon]

Submitting author: @So-Cool (Kacper Sokol)
Repository: https://github.com/fat-forensics/fat-forensics
Version: 0.0.1
Editor: @arokem
Reviewers: @bernease, @osolari

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @So-Cool. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@So-Cool if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience 😸

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@VivianePons @arokem @terrytangyuan could one of you edit this one?

[ooo]

👋 Hey @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman...

Letting you know, @VivianePons is currently OOO until Thursday, October 3rd 2019. ❤️

[arokem]

Yeah - I can take this one.

[arokem]

@whedon assign @arokem as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @arokem

[arokem]

@So-Cool : do you have any suggestions for potential reviewers?

[arokem]

👋 @ahurriyetoglu : would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

[arokem]

👋 @jkahn : would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

[arokem]

@whedon assign @bernease as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @bernease

[So-Cool]

Hi, from the provided list @sbrugman, @giodegas and @soroushj could be potential reviewers. More generally, anybody with a machine learning background and interest in algorithmic fairness, accountability and transparency will be a good fit.

[arokem]

@sbrugman : 👋 would you be willing to review this article for JOSS?

[arokem]

@giodegas: 👋 would you be willing to review this article for JOSS?

[arokem]

@soroushj: 👋 would you be willing to review this article for JOSS?

[sbrugman]

@arokem I have already committed to another review. I'm not having the time to do more at a time.

[arokem]

@giodegas or @soroushj: would either of you be able to review this article for JOSS?

[arokem]

👋 @zfurnas : would you be willing to review this article for JOSS?

[arokem]

👋 @ahurriyetoglu : would you be willing to review this article for JOSS?

[giodegas]

@giodegas or @soroushj: would either of you be able to review this article for JOSS?

I would be happy to do it, but cannot allocate time at the moment.
Sorry.

[arokem]

@freddiev4 : would you be willing to review this article for JOSS?

[arokem]

@tianxzhu : would you be willing to review this article for JOSS?

[arokem]

@So-Cool : I apologize for how long it is taking to find another reviewer. As an update: I am currently emailing some people off this issue, to see whether anyone has a good idea (or might be willing to do this themselves). I hope that we can find someone within a few days and get things kicked off here. Thank you for your patience.

[arokem]

👋 @adebayoj : would you be interested in reviewing this article for the Journal of Open Source Software? It is closely related to the work that you do, so your expertise will be
very helpful here. For more information about the journal and our process, you can refer to this webpage: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

[arokem]

👋 @linuxscout : would you be willing to review this paper for JOSS?

[arokem]

👋 @professoralkmin: would you be willing to review this paper for JOSS?

[arokem]

👋@osolari : would you be willing to review this paper for JOSS?

[osolari]

Would be happy to! Would you please send me some guidelines? :-)

[arokem]

Thanks! The reviewer guidelines are here.

[arokem]

@whedon add @osolari as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @osolari is now a reviewer

[arokem]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #1904. Feel free to close this issue now!

[arokem]

OK - thanks @bernease and @osolari for taking this on! Your reviewer checklists are on issue #1904. Please feel free to post issues related to the review on the software repository and to tag me in if you have any questions. I'll close this issue now.

[professoralkmin]

would be happy to do it! :) Em qua, 20 de nov de 2019 3:56 PM, Ariel Rokem <[email protected]> escreveu:

…

***@***.*** <https://github.com/osolari> : would you be willing to review this paper for JOSS? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1727?email_source=notifications&email_token=ANZGASD7HZMAFIRTPIR2U5TQUWB67A5CNFSM4IWT4DUKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEET2HCY#issuecomment-556245899>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANZGASBCELIXNQSEDNNQH6DQUWB67ANCNFSM4IWT4DUA> .

[arokem]

Thanks for the quick reply here, @professoralkmin : I think that we already have the requisite two reviewers, so you are off the hook. I'll call on you if we need another look. Thanks again.