Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Creating pull request for 10.21105.joss.06366 #5268

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Creating pull request for 10.21105.joss.06366 #5268

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
9e0501b
Creating 10.21105.joss.06366.pdf
editorialbot Apr 23, 2024
e42d64a
Creating 10.21105.joss.06366.crossref.xml
editorialbot Apr 23, 2024
604b3bb
Creating 10.21105.joss.06366.jats
editorialbot Apr 23, 2024
f53b923
Adding media file: strawberry_plot.png
editorialbot Apr 23, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
264 changes: 264 additions & 0 deletions joss.06366/10.21105.joss.06366.crossref.xml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<doi_batch xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.3.1"
xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd"
xmlns:rel="http://www.crossref.org/relations.xsd"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
version="5.3.1"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.3.1 http://www.crossref.org/schemas/crossref5.3.1.xsd">
<head>
<doi_batch_id>20240423T131339-85b26985be3e04ece05b13d8f535093416473d8e</doi_batch_id>
<timestamp>20240423131339</timestamp>
<depositor>
<depositor_name>JOSS Admin</depositor_name>
<email_address>[email protected]</email_address>
</depositor>
<registrant>The Open Journal</registrant>
</head>
<body>
<journal>
<journal_metadata>
<full_title>Journal of Open Source Software</full_title>
<abbrev_title>JOSS</abbrev_title>
<issn media_type="electronic">2475-9066</issn>
<doi_data>
<doi>10.21105/joss</doi>
<resource>https://joss.theoj.org</resource>
</doi_data>
</journal_metadata>
<journal_issue>
<publication_date media_type="online">
<month>04</month>
<year>2024</year>
</publication_date>
<journal_volume>
<volume>9</volume>
</journal_volume>
<issue>96</issue>
</journal_issue>
<journal_article publication_type="full_text">
<titles>
<title>The fqar package: R tools for analyzing floristic
quality assessment data</title>
</titles>
<contributors>
<person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author">
<given_name>Andrew</given_name>
<surname>Gard</surname>
<ORCID>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4434-0755</ORCID>
</person_name>
<person_name sequence="additional"
contributor_role="author">
<given_name>Alexia</given_name>
<surname>Myers</surname>
</person_name>
<person_name sequence="additional"
contributor_role="author">
<given_name>Irene</given_name>
<surname>Luwabelwa</surname>
</person_name>
</contributors>
<publication_date>
<month>04</month>
<day>23</day>
<year>2024</year>
</publication_date>
<pages>
<first_page>6366</first_page>
</pages>
<publisher_item>
<identifier id_type="doi">10.21105/joss.06366</identifier>
</publisher_item>
<ai:program name="AccessIndicators">
<ai:license_ref applies_to="vor">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ai:license_ref>
<ai:license_ref applies_to="am">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ai:license_ref>
<ai:license_ref applies_to="tdm">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ai:license_ref>
</ai:program>
<rel:program>
<rel:related_item>
<rel:description>Software archive</rel:description>
<rel:inter_work_relation relationship-type="references" identifier-type="doi">10.5281/zenodo.11002086</rel:inter_work_relation>
</rel:related_item>
<rel:related_item>
<rel:description>GitHub review issue</rel:description>
<rel:inter_work_relation relationship-type="hasReview" identifier-type="uri">https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6366</rel:inter_work_relation>
</rel:related_item>
</rel:program>
<doi_data>
<doi>10.21105/joss.06366</doi>
<resource>https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06366</resource>
<collection property="text-mining">
<item>
<resource mime_type="application/pdf">https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06366.pdf</resource>
</item>
</collection>
</doi_data>
<citation_list>
<citation key="fqadata">
<volume_title>fqadata: Contains regional floristic quality
assessment databases</volume_title>
<author>Foxfoot</author>
<cYear>2023</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Foxfoot, I. (2023). fqadata: Contains
regional floristic quality assessment databases.
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=fqadata</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="fqacalc">
<volume_title>fqacalc: Calculate floristic quality
assessment metrics</volume_title>
<author>Foxfoot</author>
<cYear>2023</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Foxfoot, I. (2023). fqacalc:
Calculate floristic quality assessment metrics.
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=fqacalc</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="JSSv059i10">
<article_title>Tidy data</article_title>
<author>Wickham</author>
<journal_title>Journal of Statistical
Software</journal_title>
<issue>10</issue>
<volume>59</volume>
<doi>10.18637/jss.v059.i10</doi>
<cYear>2014</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Wickham, H. (2014). Tidy data.
Journal of Statistical Software, 59(10), 1–23.
https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v059.i10</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="matthews2015null">
<article_title>A null model test of floristic quality
assessment: Are plant species’ coefficients of conservatism
valid?</article_title>
<author>Matthews</author>
<journal_title>Ecological Indicators</journal_title>
<volume>52</volume>
<doi>10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.11.017</doi>
<cYear>2015</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Matthews, J. W., Spyreas, G., &amp;
Long, C. M. (2015). A null model test of floristic quality assessment:
Are plant species’ coefficients of conservatism valid? Ecological
Indicators, 52, 1–7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.11.017</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="bourdaghs2006properties">
<article_title>Properties and performance of the floristic
quality index in Great Lakes coastal wetlands</article_title>
<author>Bourdaghs</author>
<journal_title>Wetlands</journal_title>
<issue>3</issue>
<volume>26</volume>
<doi>10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[718:papotf]2.0.co;2</doi>
<cYear>2006</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Bourdaghs, M., Johnston, C. A., &amp;
Regal, R. R. (2006). Properties and performance of the floristic quality
index in Great Lakes coastal wetlands. Wetlands, 26(3), 718–735.
https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[718:papotf]2.0.co;2</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="bowles2006testing">
<article_title>Testing the efficacy of species richness and
floristic quality assessment of quality, temporal change, and fire
effects in tallgrass prairie natural areas</article_title>
<author>Bowles</author>
<journal_title>Natural Areas Journal</journal_title>
<issue>1</issue>
<volume>26</volume>
<doi>10.3375/0885-8608(2006)26[17:tteosr]2.0.co;2</doi>
<cYear>2006</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Bowles, M., &amp; Jones, M. (2006).
Testing the efficacy of species richness and floristic quality
assessment of quality, temporal change, and fire effects in tallgrass
prairie natural areas. Natural Areas Journal, 26(1), 17–30.
https://doi.org/10.3375/0885-8608(2006)26[17:tteosr]2.0.co;2</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="bauer">
<article_title>Ecology of floristic quality assessment:
Testing for correlations between coefficients of conservatism, species
traits and mycorrhizal responsiveness</article_title>
<author>Bauer</author>
<journal_title>AoB PLANTS</journal_title>
<volume>10</volume>
<doi>10.1093/aobpla/plx073</doi>
<cYear>2018</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Bauer, K., J. (2018). Ecology of
floristic quality assessment: Testing for correlations between
coefficients of conservatism, species traits and mycorrhizal
responsiveness. AoB PLANTS, 10.
https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plx073</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="zinnen">
<article_title>Niche ecology in floristic quality
assessment: Are species with higher conservatism more
specialized?</article_title>
<author>Zinnen</author>
<journal_title>Ecological Indicators</journal_title>
<volume>121</volume>
<doi>10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107078</doi>
<cYear>2021</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Zinnen, S., J. (2021). Niche ecology
in floristic quality assessment: Are species with higher conservatism
more specialized? Ecological Indicators, 121.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107078</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="rcore">
<volume_title>R: A language and environment for statistical
computing</volume_title>
<author>R Core Team</author>
<cYear>2022</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>R Core Team. (2022). R: A language
and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical
Computing. https://www.R-project.org/</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="rericha">
<volume_title>Flora of the Chicago region: A floristic and
ecological synthesis</volume_title>
<author>Wilhelm</author>
<isbn>9781883362157</isbn>
<cYear>2017</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Wilhelm, G., &amp; Rericha, L.
(2017). Flora of the Chicago region: A floristic and ecological
synthesis. Indiana Academy of Sciences.
ISBN: 9781883362157</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="swink1994plants">
<volume_title>Plants of the Chicago region</volume_title>
<author>Swink</author>
<isbn>1883362016</isbn>
<cYear>1994</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Swink, F., &amp; Wilhelm, G. (1994).
Plants of the Chicago region. Indiana Academy of Science.
ISBN: 1883362016</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="spyreas2019floristic">
<article_title>Floristic quality assessment: A critique, a
defense, and a primer</article_title>
<author>Spyreas</author>
<journal_title>Ecosphere</journal_title>
<issue>8</issue>
<volume>10</volume>
<doi>10.1002/ecs2.2825</doi>
<cYear>2019</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Spyreas, G. (2019). Floristic quality
assessment: A critique, a defense, and a primer. Ecosphere, 10(8),
e02825. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2825</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
<citation key="freyman2016universal">
<article_title>The universal floristic quality assessment
(FQA) calculator: An online tool for ecological assessment and
monitoring</article_title>
<author>Freyman</author>
<journal_title>Methods in Ecology and
Evolution</journal_title>
<issue>3</issue>
<volume>7</volume>
<doi>10.1002/ecs2.2825</doi>
<cYear>2016</cYear>
<unstructured_citation>Freyman, W. A., Masters, L. A., &amp;
Packard, S. (2016). The universal floristic quality assessment (FQA)
calculator: An online tool for ecological assessment and monitoring.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(3), 380–383.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2825</unstructured_citation>
</citation>
</citation_list>
</journal_article>
</journal>
</body>
</doi_batch>
Loading