Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8313765: Invalid CEN header (invalid zip64 extra data field size) #72

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

benty-amzn
Copy link

@benty-amzn benty-amzn commented Aug 18, 2023

Backport is clean, all tests in test/jdk/java/util/zip pass.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8313765: Invalid CEN header (invalid zip64 extra data field size) (Bug - P2)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u.git pull/72/head:pull/72
$ git checkout pull/72

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/72
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u.git pull/72/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 72

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 72

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u/pull/72.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 18, 2023

👋 Welcome back btaylor! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 13f6450e2e70df4df8bd882def837fbd5bef1524 8313765: Invalid CEN header (invalid zip64 extra data field size) Aug 18, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 18, 2023

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 18, 2023

@benty-amzn This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8313765: Invalid CEN header (invalid zip64 extra data field size)

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 2 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 32a1c79: 8309591: Socket.setOption(TCP_QUICKACK) uses wrong level
  • 04adfb3: 8314262: GHA: Cut down cross-compilation sysroots deeper

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Aug 18, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 18, 2023

Webrevs

@benty-amzn
Copy link
Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Aug 21, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 21, 2023

@benty-amzn
Your change (at version 0aee44c) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@phohensee
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 21, 2023

Going to push as commit 9d1d5e7.
Since your change was applied there have been 2 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 32a1c79: 8309591: Socket.setOption(TCP_QUICKACK) uses wrong level
  • 04adfb3: 8314262: GHA: Cut down cross-compilation sysroots deeper

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Aug 21, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 21, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Aug 21, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 21, 2023

@phohensee @benty-amzn Pushed as commit 9d1d5e7.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants