Remove the whole 'Support for Federations/Trust Schemes' section #282
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jogu
approved these changes
Oct 15, 2024
Sakurann
approved these changes
Oct 15, 2024
tplooker
approved these changes
Oct 15, 2024
nemqe
approved these changes
Oct 15, 2024
awoie
approved these changes
Oct 15, 2024
…of TRAIN ref https://oid2022.compute.dtu.dk/index.html so that can be removed too
c2bo
approved these changes
Oct 17, 2024
|
6 approvals, open a week, discussed on last week's WG calls - merging! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As an alternative fix to the one in #280, which is an alternative fix to the one in #279
Some more on issues with this section:
#274 (comment)
#274 (comment)
And I'm pretty sure the claims parameter with = { "vp_token": { "presentation_definition": { ... isn't a thing anymore
as noted by @jogu in #280, if this stuff is needed and can be written down in a consumable and accurate way, maybe the emergent federation-wallet spec would be a more appropriate place.