Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Governance for Teams to Discussions migration #2120

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 13, 2023
Merged

Update Governance for Teams to Discussions migration #2120

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions developers/governance.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ openHAB is a meritocracy. The more that somebody contributes, the more responsib
## Structure

The openHAB project is a big ecosystem of different components.
While people often think of the runtime + addons when talking about openHAB, there are other parts like openHAB Cloud, the mobile apps, the voice skills, etc. - all in all, there are well over [40 different repos](https://github.com/openhab) under the openHAB GitHub organization.
While people often think of the runtime + addons when talking about openHAB, there are other parts like openHAB Cloud, the mobile apps, the voice skills, etc. - all in all, there are well over [40 different repos](https://github.com/orgs/openhab/repositories) under the openHAB GitHub organization.

The different components are mostly maintained independently of each other. Many have their own release cycles and a dedicated maintainer team.

Expand All @@ -48,9 +48,9 @@ Maintainers take care of the respective repository, i.e. they
- sync with other maintainer teams wrt cross-team changes
- announce important news in the community

In general, a maintainer team is free to define its own rules of how the work in the team is organized, e.g. what is required for a PR to be accepted. Those rules should be written down as a pinned discussion on the GitHub team page, see [this one](https://github.com/orgs/openhab/teams/2-x-add-ons-maintainers) as an example.
In general, a maintainer team is free to define its own rules of how the work in the team is organized, e.g. what is required for a PR to be accepted. Those rules should be written down as a pinned discussion on the GitHub Discussions page, see [this one](https://github.com/openhab/openhab-addons/discussions/14694) as an example.

A [couple of rules](https://github.com/orgs/openhab/teams/maintainers/discussions/1) must be followed by all maintainer teams, they ensure that there's some consistency in the workflows across the different repositories.
A [couple of rules](https://github.com/openhab/openhab-distro/discussions/1505) must be followed by all maintainer teams, they ensure that there's some consistency in the workflows across the different repositories.

### Maintainer Elections

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ Comprising the finest technical leaders from all community stake holders, it is

The Architecture Council is responsible for all decisions that have a significant impact across different components and which touch any fundamental concepts how openHAB works and behaves.

Discussions and decisions are done on the [Github team page](https://github.com/orgs/openhab/teams/architecture-council).
Discussions and decisions are done in the [GitHub AC Discussions](https://github.com/openhab/openhab-distro/discussions/categories/architecture-council-discussions).
Decisions are taken unanimously.
This is the case if no member of the AC vetos against a proposed resolution within a week of the call for votes on the topic.

Expand Down