-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 429
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[metering] Fix dependency issue in io.monitor bundle (#2288) #2289
Merged
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ee9a15c
[metering] Fix dependency issue in io.monitor bundle (#2288)
246460d
[metering] incorporate feedback from CR; fix build warnings (#2288)
e1411ff
[metering] incorporate feedback from CR; fix build warnings (#2288)
7ae4e91
remove usage of Objects.requireNonNull
kaikreuzer a728f15
Merge pull request #1 from kaikreuzer/issue-2288
pravussum File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is the split-package good for?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added them because there was a warning in the bnd-maven plugin:
Split package, multiple jars provide the same package
- thb I don't know where these duplicates originate from, I'm quite inexperienced with bnd/OSGI.The split-package directive basically just sets the default strategy explicitly and thus removes the warning, not really the root cause. Any advice appreciated. Seems to work, though - I built the distribution and ran the Metrics IO addon and it produces results with no issues whatsoever.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My assumption is that this is because the original jar is on the build path as well as the extracted classes - so bnd thinks that two different bundles provide this package. The setting should thus be useless at runtime. It only suppresses the warning at build time. Not sure if we should keep it for this.
@wborn As our bnd expert: Do you have any opinion here?