-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[omnikinverter] Add channels for voltage and current #11645
Conversation
.../src/main/java/org/openhab/binding/omnikinverter/internal/OmnikInverterBindingConstants.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...r/src/main/java/org/openhab/binding/omnikinverter/internal/handler/OmnikInverterHandler.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@wborn not sure how to remove the "work in progress" tag, if that's to-be changed be committer in the first place. Either way, I think a review can be done in the current state. Please also see my own review comments, which are basically questions to the reviewer. |
Thanks for the update! I've removed the label. 🙂 |
.../src/main/java/org/openhab/binding/omnikinverter/internal/OmnikInverterBindingConstants.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
bundles/org.openhab.binding.omnikinverter/src/main/resources/OH-INF/thing/thing-types.xml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
bundles/org.openhab.binding.omnikinverter/src/main/resources/OH-INF/thing/thing-types.xml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
bundles/org.openhab.binding.omnikinverter/src/main/resources/OH-INF/thing/thing-types.xml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
bundles/org.openhab.binding.omnikinverter/src/main/resources/OH-INF/thing/thing-types.xml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
bundles/org.openhab.binding.omnikinverter/src/main/resources/OH-INF/thing/thing-types.xml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
bundles/org.openhab.binding.omnikinverter/src/main/resources/OH-INF/thing/thing-types.xml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
7f102fc
to
23d904d
Compare
Signed-off-by: Hans van den Bogert <[email protected]>
Not sure if I should explicitly ask for (re)review, so just a gentle ping @lolodomo |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
…b#11645) Signed-off-by: Hans van den Bogert <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Nick Waterton <[email protected]>
…b#11645) Signed-off-by: Hans van den Bogert <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Schmidt <[email protected]>
…b#11645) Signed-off-by: Hans van den Bogert <[email protected]>
…b#11645) Signed-off-by: Hans van den Bogert <[email protected]>
…b#11645) Signed-off-by: Hans van den Bogert <[email protected]>
…b#11645) Signed-off-by: Hans van den Bogert <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andras Uhrin <[email protected]>
Novel Addition: Add multiple channels for:
These data was always already in the network packet returned by the inverter, so no new retrieval code was necessary, only extra decoding of the binary packet coming from the inverter.
For the reviewer:
Is this other than the README.md?
Is this other than the README.md?