Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue 1111-核心阻塞队列枚举 BlockingQueueTypeEnum.createBlockingQueue(String blockingQueueName, Integer capacity)抛出NPE问题修复 #1117

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 16, 2023

Conversation

LiXuemin
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #1111

Changes proposed in this pull request:

  • optimize: 核心阻塞队列枚举 BlockingQueueTypeEnum.createBlockingQueue(String blockingQueueName, Integer capacity)抛出NPE问题修复
  • refactor: 临时容量变量名 temCapacity 改为 tempCapacity

Check mailbox configuration when submitting. Contributor Guide

@LiXuemin LiXuemin changed the title Issue 1111 Issue 1111-核心阻塞队列枚举 BlockingQueueTypeEnum.createBlockingQueue(String blockingQueueName, Integer capacity)抛出NPE问题修复 Mar 16, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 16, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (275a8bf) 28.08% compared to head (b675c24) 28.08%.

❗ Current head b675c24 differs from pull request most recent head 6095018. Consider uploading reports for the commit 6095018 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             develop    #1117   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage      28.08%   28.08%           
  Complexity       717      717           
==========================================
  Files            258      258           
  Lines           5864     5864           
  Branches         536      536           
==========================================
  Hits            1647     1647           
  Misses          4059     4059           
  Partials         158      158           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...common/executor/support/BlockingQueueTypeEnum.java 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@magestacks magestacks merged commit ed16c90 into opengoofy:develop Mar 16, 2023
@LiXuemin LiXuemin deleted the issue-1111 branch March 16, 2023 02:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants