-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GeoTIFF encoding profile for CIS 1.1 GeneralGridCoverage #22
Comments
@jerstlouis @cmheazel @EmDevys It would also be great if the next version of the CIS GeoTIFF Profile references the OGC GeoTIFF 1.1 standard, if possible. |
Good point Gobe, fully subscribe to this proposal
Emmanuel
De : ghobona ***@***.***
Envoyé : vendredi 12 novembre 2021 11:58
À : opengeospatial/coverage-implementation-schema
Cc : Emmanuel Devys; Mention
Objet : Re: [opengeospatial/coverage-implementation-schema] GeoTIFF encoding profile for CIS 1.1 GeneralGridCoverage (Issue #22)
@jerstlouis<https://github.com/jerstlouis> @cmheazel<https://github.com/cmheazel> @EmDevys<https://github.com/EmDevys>
It would also be great if the next version of the CIS GeoTIFF Profile references the OGC GeoTIFF 1.1 standard, if possible.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#22 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACDHG2UKYNX24RQP4JS2XDLULTXNFANCNFSM5H3VQHZQ>.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675> or Android<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
|
A new GeoTIFF CIS 1.1 profile could possibly rely on extended TIFF tags to directly encode the CIS DomainSet / RangeType information inside the file and properly associate GeoTIFF bands with range value fields and/or a temporal axis without relying on a separate GML or JSON encoded file that can get dissociated and lost. |
The OGC® GML Application Schema - Coverages - GeoTIFF Coverage Encoding Profile specifies the use of CIS 1.0 coverage types to be deprecated. We should define a new profile based on CIS 1.1 GeneralGridCoverage.
The GeoTIFF encoding profile notes about PixelIsArea also suffer from moving origin at different resolutions and mismatched envelope / extent / domain, and do not match the proposal in #6 to properly distinguish between ValueIsPoint / ValueIsArea in CIS 1.1. In particular, the proposal solves clashes and inconsistencies from not being able to describe the actual extent of the data, and being able to retrieve both a map and a coverage from the same OGC API - Common - Part 2 "collection".
Since this is defined for the GMLCOV coverage classes that may be deprecated, perhaps that is not a major issue. We probably need a new version of the GeoTIFF encoding profile for CIS 1.1 because this profile requires one of the types to be deprecated anyways.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: