Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release: JS and Go model in module errors #391

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ewanharris
Copy link
Member

Description

Setups releases for JS and Go to include the following changes, I've tried to track all the right changes for Go but the commit history is making it a little hard to ensure I'm documenting everything useful

JS

Fixed:

- Error when a model file is provided as part of a modular model (#386) - thanks @fsedano!
- Validation of Object IDs is aligned with the OpenFGA server (#348)

Go

Added:

- Ability to visualize graph in reverse (i.e. the direction of a Check request) (#345)
- Model graph now has edges for computed usersets (#342)
- Model graph now includes cycle detection (#344)
- Model graph now exposes extra getters (#379)

Fixed:

- Error when a model file is provided as part of a modular model (#386) - thanks @fsedano!
- Model graphing now correctly tracks wildcard relation types (#356)
- Validation of Object IDs is aligned with the OpenFGA server (#348)

References

Review Checklist

  • I have clicked on "allow edits by maintainers".
  • I have added documentation for new/changed functionality in this PR or in a PR to openfga.dev [Provide a link to any relevant PRs in the references section above]
  • The correct base branch is being used, if not main
  • I have added tests to validate that the change in functionality is working as expected

If you haven't done so yet, we would appreciate it if you could star the OpenFGA repository. :)

@ewanharris ewanharris requested review from a team as code owners November 25, 2024 12:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant