Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: fix contentContainer test #1516

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

dcoa
Copy link
Contributor

@dcoa dcoa commented Nov 18, 2024

This PR fixes the testing after the merge of #1458

@dcoa dcoa requested a review from a team as a code owner November 18, 2024 22:32
@bradenmacdonald bradenmacdonald enabled auto-merge (squash) November 18, 2024 22:39
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.04%. Comparing base (ba48a27) to head (da054ba).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1516      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.04%   93.04%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1048     1049       +1     
  Lines       20544    20582      +38     
  Branches     4363     4445      +82     
==========================================
+ Hits        19116    19151      +35     
- Misses       1358     1359       +1     
- Partials       70       72       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

@bradenmacdonald
Copy link
Contributor

Merging manually since there is something wrong with the cla check, but I know @dcoa is authorized, and all the other checks have passed.

@openedx-webhooks
Copy link

Thanks for the pull request, @dcoa!

What's next?

Please work through the following steps to get your changes ready for engineering review:

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

  • If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
    • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
  • If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.

🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

  • Dependencies

    This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

  • Blockers

    This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

  • Timeline information

    This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

  • Partner information

    This is for a course on edx.org.

  • Supporting documentation
  • Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads

🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

🔘 Let us know that your PR is ready for review:

Who will review my changes?

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/2u-tnl. Tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for review.

Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

  • The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
  • The need for product review
  • Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

@openedx-webhooks openedx-webhooks added the open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U label Nov 19, 2024
@bradenmacdonald bradenmacdonald merged commit b260708 into openedx:master Nov 19, 2024
7 checks passed
@PKulkoRaccoonGang
Copy link
Contributor

@dcoa perhaps the error in the master that we now have on the Schedule and Details page is also related to the change of fetchImages to fetchCourseImages. Can you take a look?

image

@dcoa
Copy link
Contributor Author

dcoa commented Nov 20, 2024

I don't have exactly the same error message

image

but I can tell the error comes from this change

{!isLibraryV1Key(learningContextId) && (

Previously the line was

      {!isLibrary && (

And Schedule and Details pass the prop (isLibrary as true) so the ImageUploadModal is skip and the error is not displayed

I think there should be a different prop, I mean, Schedule and Details is not a library is part of courses.

How to test

I would like to ask you @PKulkoRaccoonGang if you can try in your environment and check if the assumption described is right.

Solutions

A possible solution could be pass a new prop different to isLibrary to skip the modal (Rename isLibrary for enableImageUpload).

As well as you thoughts about a new prop.

Thanks

@bradenmacdonald
Copy link
Contributor

A possible solution could be pass a new prop different to isLibrary to skip the modal (Rename isLibrary for enableImageUpload).

@dcoa That makes sense to me. If this is broken on master and affecting edx.org please make sure we fix it ASAP. It's probably better to ping people on Slack or make a fix proactively.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants